Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte Hornets @ New York Knicks


carolinajay

Recommended Posts

Okay, i am officially on the trade MKG boat. You don't get to have starter minute and walk away with 9 pts on 6 shots. Kaminsky was 3/14 but at least he takes his opportunities. When was the last time MKG shot 14x? I need my SF to attack/shoot and not give up 35 pts. MKG is a good defender, but he allows his opponent to rest on defense because he is absent on offense.

Sent from my SM-N900P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Okay, i am officially on the trade MKG boat. You don't get to have starter minute and walk away with 9 pts on 6 shots. Kaminsky was 3/14 but at least he takes his opportunities. When was the last time MKG shot 14x? I need my SF to attack/shoot and not give up 35 pts. MKG is a good defender, but he allows his opponent to rest on defense because he is absent on offense.

Sent from my SM-N900P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Trade him for who?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

Okay, i am officially on the trade MKG boat. You don't get to have starter minute and walk away with 9 pts on 6 shots. Kaminsky was 3/14 but at least he takes his opportunities. When was the last time MKG shot 14x? I need my SF to attack/shoot and not give up 35 pts. MKG is a good defender, but he allows his opponent to rest on defense because he is absent on offense.

Sent from my SM-N900P using CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

im done with him too

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We can either go after a replacement at SF or get a more traditional SG and let Batum slide back to his natural position of SF.. send MKG packing and give me Ariza, Gallinari, Wilson Chandler, Rudy Gay or Alec Burks.. that's how sour I am on the kid now.. I love him to death personally but I cannot help the fact that he is not contributing on offense.. this is a league about scoring.. he isn't taking the other teams major scorer away - Melo, Kawai and a half dozen other players just hung 25+ on him and he might have barely gotten into double digits.. I need anyone that can shoot and play reasonable defense.. I don't need a lock down defender that lets his guy rest of defense because he is a non factor when we get the ball.. im sorry but i wash my hands..

I hope im wrong and he blows up for a 20/10 kinda game - but even if he does - he will comeback with a 5/7 game the very next night..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...