Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Minister of Trolling


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

If you are interested in applying for the Huddle Minister of Trolling position, please do so here.

Responsibilities include singling out trolls, conducting investigations of trolling activities, producing polls of banishment, and acting upon said banishment if justified.

Please state your case as to why you should be selected. I will take the number of pie given to your post into consideration.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear me having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

raw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

I would nominate a troll for this job.

Now this I can get along with.  Can we give Football Lives Matter this position?  

He would ban the constant "sunshine pumpers" that literally make no sense when they type.  "We have a great secondary."  "Worley has been great recently."  Or "We can still make the Playoffs."  Some of this retarded poo is awful.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting.

Though putting bwood in charge of dealing with trolls would be like putting a 500 lb man with an eating problem in charge of rationing dwindling food supplies in an apocalypse.

I mean, I guess if we needed someone to make racist remarks about nappy heads, and welfare, he'd fit the bill.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear my having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

3 minutes ago, nctarheel0619 said:

raw

giphy.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 15 said:

why should I be the minister of trolling?

I'm like a PO officer that used to be a gang member back in the day, but has cleaned up and found jesus and now wants to help kids heading down the wrong path and keep them off the streets. I can sniff a troll job out from a mile away. I can name every single troll on this forum, even the ones that some people may think just be "stupid" or "overreacting". they hate me and would fear me having the power to put an end to their BS.

I have the huddle open and am browsing from 8am-5pm PST every day and randomly throughout the weekend. I've been a member here since the server crash. I want to make the huddle great again and build a fugging wall so high that these kids can't climb over it and clog this beautiful forum with terrible content.

vote for me:

giphy.gif 

your from LA and you're a dodger and lakers fan. 

perfect candidate in my eyes! Although given the 3 hour time difference, you'll have to start working at the crack of dawn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • They know within 15 mins.  Many moons ago skins drafted Heath Shuler at like 5th overall and Gus Frerotte in the late rounds. You know the plan, its Heaths team. Old OLman stink said within 15 minutes they knew Gus was the better QB.  I didn't need 15 or players on the same field, I just knew like Bill said "he better walk on water", which he hasn't. I do blame tepper mainly for it, he spend the greater part of 2 year telling everyone Watson would be a panther......and fail....but a great fail...then Stanford turned panthers down.....tepper was beyond pissed and wanted a QB. He forced the trade and picked BY......and now by .....some grace of the gods formed a team with 4 QBs of no hope...... insane given the other roster spots.....
    • He definitely knows nothing about the Panthers, but there’s no denying he’s a pioneer in this whole draft grading and mock draft field.
    • I actually say wait five years since that's long enough to know if a player  became something worthy enough for a long term contract, whether with their original team or someone else. Therefore... 1 (8): Jaycee Horn - Has been questions about his durability but when he's healthy, he plays at a high level. Should we have drafted Pat Surtain or Micah Parsons, however? Arguably could’ve done better, but he's still here so that's a W pick. 2 (59): Terrance Marshall - Yet another classic Panther WR bust. I don’t recall seeing anything in his college tape that made me excited about drafting him in the first place.  3 (70): Brady Christensen - Proved to be a versatile player on the O-line.  As of now, we haven’t signed him back and I feel that we should. That's enough to say he was a solid draft pick. 3 (83): Tommy Tremble - Hasn't emerged as a consistent productive player, but he's had his moments here and there. We can certainly do better, but we haven’t found that guy yet so he still has some utility. W because he's not Ian Thomas. 4 (126): Chuba Hubbard - Surprise of the draft. It took time, but he's now our lead back.  5 (158): Daviyon Nixon - Had a half a sack with us and... that's it. I think I liked what I saw but it didn't pan out. 5 (166): Keith Taylor - Another guy I liked but only stuck around for two years. Played for a few other teams but nothing really to note. 6 (193): Deonte Brown - I really thought this guy was going to be a steal. He might’ve been the guy that had weight issues and never really got a handle on it. 6 (204): Shi Smith - He scored double the touchdowns that Marshall did in his short time here; it was two. Yeah, the Panthers wide receiver history is rather bleak. 6 (222): Thomas Fletcher - I had to look it up but he was a long snapper. JJ Jansen is immortal, so it was a wasted draft pick. 7 (232): Phil Hoskins - Actually recorded a sack here in his short career. Wish I could remember it.   Surprisingly not a bad draft when you have two good/great starters and a JAG that's still here, plus a good rotation guy most would like to keep. 
×
×
  • Create New...