Coaching staff interviews are happening, but...

[Snake]

5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Early on in his time here, Rivera hired two or three coaches that he wound up firing a year later.

Don't know whether he's changed his processes any since then.

I still think Rivera is terrible at personnel decisions. Hopefully Dave will get a input because that's where he excels at.

[KillerKat]

Hopefully this is Ron's last year having to make any decisions about anything dealing with this team.

[pantherclaw]

18 hours ago, Mojo said:

I get being thorough but I hate how slow this guy seems to move in general.  That's how we end up getting hand me downs.

Lol @ hand me downs. You are so delusional.

[Mojo]

5 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Lol @ hand me downs. You are so delusional.

Whatever you say Nancy.  

[Anybodyhome]

17 hours ago, Ship said:

also, the majority of this staff has been together for like 4-6 years. they're probably pretty tight.

Funny, I wish they'd recognize how that same attribute can work for an O-line. 

Keep 'em together for 4-6 years and you'll have a solid, consistently winning football team.  

[pantherclaw]

35 minutes ago, Mojo said:

Whatever you say Nancy.  

You're the one saying, "hand me downs," over coaches you don't even know, as if you are one to even know a damn thing about what you spew.

[Mojo]

18 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You're the one saying, "hand me downs," over coaches you don't even know, as if you are one to even know a damn thing about what you spew.

You don't agree, big deal.  It's immature of you to resort to antagonistic half witted insults as opposed to providing contrary evidence.  

Since you seem to be a little sluggish at following along I'll spell this out for you.

Hand me downs are

2. Of inferior quality; shabby. 

Aka the stuff no one else wants.  Mike Shula is a hand me down.   Leave it alone.  

 

[Mother Grabber]

5 hours ago, billionairemonk said:

I have done it.  hired two employees quickly after one interview because I knew they were a fit.  this was 5 years ago.  they are still with the company and doing well.  some people have the ability to make quick decisions that are good.  Ron is not one of these people, and that's fine.  everyone has their process, the only thing that matters is the result.

it's not always about making a quick decision, but usually about finding a quality candidate. how many HOF caliber coaches do you think are out there? it's not like they can open a req and get a few hundred qualified applicants in a week.

[billionairemonk]

3 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

it's not always about making a quick decision, but usually about finding a quality candidate. how many HOF caliber coaches do you think are out there? it's not like they can open a req and get a few hundred qualified applicants in a week.

yep, that's basically what I said

[Mother Grabber]

57 minutes ago, billionairemonk said:

yep, that's basically what I said

not really, but ok.

[billionairemonk]

1 minute ago, Mother Grabber said:

not really, but ok.

you may want to read your original post to which I replied, then read my reply again.  I even made the text bold

[Mother Grabber]

3 hours ago, billionairemonk said:

you may want to read your original post to which I replied, then read my reply again.  I even made the text bold

your main point, to which you were replying to my post, was about the speed at which you were able to find acceptable candidates. you were suggesting that you finding good candidates was due to your mad skills as a hiring manager.

my point is that the speed of finding an acceptable candidate often relies on elements out of your control, such as the size of the talent pool for the job you are hiring. 

[billionairemonk]

12 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

your main point, to which you were replying to my post, was about the speed at which you were able to find acceptable candidates. you were suggesting that you finding good candidates was due to your mad skills as a hiring manager.

my point is that the speed of finding an acceptable candidate often relies on elements out of your control, such as the size of the talent pool for the job you are hiring. 

never said it was due to "mad skills"; just replying to your point that "if you don't want to rehire again in 6 months, you better take your time". I gave an example showing otherwise.  then I said this:

some people have the ability to make quick decisions that are good.  Ron is not one of these people, and that's fine.  everyone has their process, the only thing that matters is the result.

then you said: "it's not always about making a quick decision, but finding a high quality candidate" 

^basically what I said

It seems you just like to argue; that's fine.  say what you will, I will no longer participate.  have a good evening