Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching staff interviews are happening, but...

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Snake Grand Master

Snake

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Early on in his time here, Rivera hired two or three coaches that he wound up firing a year later.

Don't know whether he's changed his processes any since then.

I still think Rivera is terrible at personnel decisions. Hopefully Dave will get a input because that's where he excels at.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Anybodyhome Grand Master

Anybodyhome

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, Ship said:

also, the majority of this staff has been together for like 4-6 years. they're probably pretty tight.

Funny, I wish they'd recognize how that same attribute can work for an O-line. 

Keep 'em together for 4-6 years and you'll have a solid, consistently winning football team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mojo Newbie

Mojo

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

You're the one saying, "hand me downs," over coaches you don't even know, as if you are one to even know a damn thing about what you spew.

You don't agree, big deal.  It's immature of you to resort to antagonistic half witted insults as opposed to providing contrary evidence.  

Since you seem to be a little sluggish at following along I'll spell this out for you.

Hand me downs are

2. Of inferior quality; shabby. 

Aka the stuff no one else wants.  Mike Shula is a hand me down.   Leave it alone.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, billionairemonk said:

I have done it.  hired two employees quickly after one interview because I knew they were a fit.  this was 5 years ago.  they are still with the company and doing well.  some people have the ability to make quick decisions that are good.  Ron is not one of these people, and that's fine.  everyone has their process, the only thing that matters is the result.

it's not always about making a quick decision, but usually about finding a quality candidate. how many HOF caliber coaches do you think are out there? it's not like they can open a req and get a few hundred qualified applicants in a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
billionairemonk Newbie

billionairemonk

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

it's not always about making a quick decision, but usually about finding a quality candidate. how many HOF caliber coaches do you think are out there? it's not like they can open a req and get a few hundred qualified applicants in a week.

yep, that's basically what I said

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, billionairemonk said:

you may want to read your original post to which I replied, then read my reply again.  I even made the text bold

your main point, to which you were replying to my post, was about the speed at which you were able to find acceptable candidates. you were suggesting that you finding good candidates was due to your mad skills as a hiring manager.

my point is that the speed of finding an acceptable candidate often relies on elements out of your control, such as the size of the talent pool for the job you are hiring. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
billionairemonk Newbie

billionairemonk

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Mother Grabber said:

your main point, to which you were replying to my post, was about the speed at which you were able to find acceptable candidates. you were suggesting that you finding good candidates was due to your mad skills as a hiring manager.

my point is that the speed of finding an acceptable candidate often relies on elements out of your control, such as the size of the talent pool for the job you are hiring. 

never said it was due to "mad skills"; just replying to your point that "if you don't want to rehire again in 6 months, you better take your time". I gave an example showing otherwise.  then I said this:

some people have the ability to make quick decisions that are good.  Ron is not one of these people, and that's fine.  everyone has their process, the only thing that matters is the result.

then you said: "it's not always about making a quick decision, but finding a high quality candidate" 

^basically what I said

It seems you just like to argue; that's fine.  say what you will, I will no longer participate.  have a good evening

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Basbear
      Unc Basketball thread

      By Basbear · Posted

      The guy has not coach college in ten years and in that span its greatly changed. Still take him over Davis, I want to see the presser and if billy still has fire in his eyes for college non-sense.....plus you know billy will want a multi-million staff.  This is interesting, very....... glad the old guard FINALLY steps aside......
    • LinvilleGorge
      College Basketball 2025

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • Basbear
      Processing Blue: immediate draft needs

      By Basbear · Posted

      He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
×
×
  • Create New...