Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How a 'Bad Move' sticks with a Franchise


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

Drafting DJ Augustine over Brook Lopez (2008 Draft):
I think we all knew this was a bad move right when it happened.

If you don't remember - We have drafted, at #9 overall mind you, an undersized PG to come off the bench behind Felton - while ignoring the potential Allstar Center - when your bigs were Okafor (often injured), Diop (bleh) and Nazr (old). You don't have to wait months or years to see the affects of this terrible pick - all it takes is minutes. We also had the #20 pick. In this draft we wanted to walk away Guard and Big. We took the PG first and Hoping one of the other bigs would fall (Hibbert, JaVale, JJ Hickson or Ajinca). A run happened and all we were left with was Ajinca. If we took Lopez at #9, we still would have been able to grab (#22) Courtney Lee, (#25) Nick Batum or (#26) George Hill with the #20 pick. So instead of one bad pick - we doubled down and grabbed 2 terrible picks.

Instead of swallowing our pride and admitting we goofed - the next year - we draft Hendo instead of Allstars PGs = Jrue holiday and Jeff Teague - also there was Ty Lawson who wasn't an Allstar but was much better than Augustine. All three were taken just 4 picks after Hendo. But no worries - We now we have our SG of the future (who can't shoot the 3pt shot). Congrats - 1 bad move has now evolved into 3 really, really bad moves. It only took another season for everything to collapse and we completely started a rebuild after shipping Stephen Jackson and Gerald Wallace out for picks and players.

Signing Lance Stephenson (2014):
This one we all thought was a great move when it happened. I remember where I was when I heard the announcement come over the radio on my way to work.

By the time we figured it out, we were midway through the season and he had become a locker room cancer. We needed to move his contract - or did we? We had signed him to a 2 yr deal with a 3rd year team option. We were already done the 1st year when we decided to ship him to the Clipper for Spencer Hawes. Hawes had 3 years left on his terrible contract. So we basically flipped a bad contract for a even longer bad contract. But it didn't end there. After letting Hawes play for a year and a half (again, almost through with him..) - we decided to flip him for Plumlee. Probably the worst contract/deal I have seen since we traded Tyson Chandler for Erick Dampier.

So essentially, the Lance deal (3yr 27mil w/player option for 3rd) has caused us to go to Plumlee (4yr 48mil). When you keep kicking the can down the road - this is what happens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not drafting Lopez was definitely an "ouch" moment.

 

Plumlee trade looks terrible because Hibbert would come off the books and Hawes shortly after (although his 6 mil per looks fantastic in today's market even if he elected to opt into his player option).

 

I keep thinking, with our current contracts...is it even possible to make a competitive play for Curry on the dream scenario that he wants to come "home?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

after thinking about our franchise for the past few days and how terrible we really are - i think we need to stop protesting DeVos and Trump and start protesting Cho..

For some reason I thought he was decent at trades and FAs but just sucked at drafts.. now I'm really thinking he is just an overall terrible GM..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Carl Spackler said:

Nah I'm still protesting DeVos and Trump

not trying to get this thrown in the tinderbox but... hell mutha-fuggin yeah!!

all my dummie friends, who i used to never be able to have a political conversation with - they now are totally pluggin in to what is going on.. possibly the only good thing the Orange King has done..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

bad move after bad move with cho.

besides from the draft, terrible trade after terrible trade, signing lance stephenson and other horrible signings. Oh but he signed Marvin Williams and Nic Batum so hes a good GM in some people's eyes. Give me a great. If he wasn't MJs little bitch boy he would have been fired a long time ago

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cho is completely in over his head.  He has no eye for talent which is a trait he shares with MJ.  Unfortunately, he's willing to agree with everything MJ says, and that's how we've ended up in this situation.  No other professional sports franchise that I'm aware of can say they're owned by the GOAT.  That's pretty damn cool.  However, MJ needs to hire a real GM and stay completely out of the operations of this team.  He's the real problem.  He can't stay out of his own way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...