Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DNewton on Panthers free agents


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

DE Mario Addison: Rivera said at the end of the season that his sack leader (9.5) was a complete defensive end after spending much of the past few years referring to him as a pass-rush specialist. No doubt Addison brings a lot as a pass-rusher. He has 22 sacks over the past three seasons combined. He also will be 30 in September, not an age at which general manager Dave Gettleman will likely make a huge investment. It's a decent year for ends in the draft, so the Panthers may let Addison test the free-agent waters even though he wants to return. Gettleman won't overspend here.

WR Ted Ginn Jr.: He'll be 32 in April, but he still has elite speed and the Panthers need all the speed they can get. His 54 catches for 752 yards and four touchdowns were second on the team among wide receivers to Kelvin Benjamin (63, 941, 7). He's also still dependable as a kick returner, although his 7.0 yards per punt return was his lowest since 2009. But he shouldn't come with a big price tag and his speed can be an asset, so odds favor him returning. Still, look for the Panthers to add more speed at this position in the draft and free agency.

OT Mike Remmers: He hasn't reached the point that Byron Bell did a few years ago when the Panthers needed to move on from him. Although he struggled at times, he held down the left tackle spot the final 13 games after Michael Oher was diagnosed with a concussion. Is he worth a big contract? At 27, this is Remmers' best chance to get one. He may want to test the market even though he wants to return. If he wants fair right tackle money, bringing him back seems likely. Much here depends on that as the Panthers look to add other tackles in the open market. Whether there are signs Oher will clear the concussion protocol and be ready to go in 2017 also is a factor.

OL Chris Scott: You may be surprised to see Scott's name here over linebacker A.J. Klein or safety Colin Jones. That's because upgrading the offensive line is a priority, and Scott's versatility to play guard, tackle or even center makes him valuable. He's 29 and probably won't ask for a big number, particularly after the Panthers stuck with him after he was suspended for four games for violating the league's performance enhancing drug policy. I'm not so sure Klein is a priority with the team high on 2015 draft pick David Mayo as a backup to Luke Kuechly, and with linebacker Ben Jacobs getting a two-year deal. Jones is likely to re-sign as a special teams player.

DE Charles Johnson: Rivera said Johnson was Carolina's most consistent defensive lineman this past season despite missing three games with a hamstring injury, and he'd like to have him back. Johnson hasn't reached double-digits in sacks since 2013 when he had 11 and he'll be 31 in July. But he's a locker-room leader and is probably willing to re-sign for a bargain like he did a year ago (one year, $3 million). Another such deal seems likely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish there were good enough free agent OTs this year so we could at least put Remmers on the fuging bench where he belongs.

I'm sick and fuging tired of the Panthers organization just sticking with players that consistently fail to perform well in key situations. I'm looking at you Mike Remmers and Graham Gano.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To me, it depends on the contract Remmers demands.  I'm not the guy who wants to set Remmers on fire, I just want him relocated to a backup role.  If anyone on the O-line gets injured for a game or 2, I trust Remmers to hold the fort for a short period, but only to only hold down the fort, the problem is I don't trust him to get a job done starting for 16 games, particularly against speed rushers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I was watching a YouTube and it was said that scout and GM insider types were saying the NIL had killed rounds 4-7. I don’t know that I buy it, seems like it might for a year or maybe two but then those guys have to move on.  NCAA is apparently about to give 5 years of eligibility. It is gonna skew those entrants older maybe.   
    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...