Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Big Ugly Makeovers


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

A lot of 'used to be good" uglys have hit the open market in recent weeks with teams deciding their performance wasn't worth their salary anymore.  

A few years back, Michael Oher was one of those guys. And prior to his now apparently devastating concussion, it looked like the time back under his original position coach John Matsko had done him a lot of good.

So the question I have would be whether Oher was unique due to his relationship with Matsko or can Matsko perhaps pull off a similar stunt with Matt Kalil or someone else.

Can Matsko make one of these guys ugly again? And if so, who should it be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matsko is garbage. The Ravens OL as much better when he left. Our blocking schemes are garbage. Matt Kalil may not be garbage, seems to be effort issues with him, honestly having his brother here, there's no better fit from an accountability standpoint. That's what he needs, in my line of work from a management perspective I look at skill vs will. Kalil's issues are mostly will, if I were another team, I would not sign him due to this, but with Matt here I would sign him in a heartbeat 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to say Kalil.  He has the athletic ability to play LT at a high level, he just hasn't had the coaching.  Coming to Carolina with his bro, a great coach, and a team ready to made a SB run might be enough to push him to play his best.  This assuming he's back to form from his hip injury.

Okung - he's had as many health issues.

Fluker is Daryl Williams (as was stated by someone else in another).

After that....I dunno.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Swaggasaurus said:

Matsko is garbage. The Ravens OL as much better when he left. Our blocking schemes are garbage. Matt Kalil may not be garbage, seems to be effort issues with him, honestly having his brother here, there's no better fit from an accountability standpoint. That's what he needs, in my line of work from a management perspective I look at skill vs will. Kalil's issues are mostly will, if I were another team, I would not sign him due to this, but with Matt here I would sign him in a heartbeat 

I'm not the world's biggest Matsko fan either, honestly.

But I'm looking for other's opinions on he and our potential new friends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Man that "used to be good" feeling is a real b!tch.  When Jeremy proposed that "how many reps of 225 can you do" question, I got thinking...man I used to do a lot.  Now I get winded taking the elevator.

Is this your new alt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Man that "used to be good" feeling is a real b!tch.  When Jeremy proposed that "how many reps of 225 can you do" question, I got thinking...man I used to do a lot.  Now I get winded taking the elevator.

Insert Toby Keith song here...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Truth. Like when UNC hired Butch Davis and then we get hit for recruiting violations. Like yeah, no poo. Dude coached Miami when they we paying like the 33rd NFL team. What did you expect?
    • He's a hard player to rank, cause he is a young NT. I do see his abilities to branch out among the DL. That's the only way for him to land in the 1st, some team has to believe he's got the stuff to play DE or T3.... I just don't see using 19 on him, I feel there should be around 7 players just ranked higher than him for the Panthers team.  ___________________________________________________________________   Now you are a roster nut like me. Im tossing this into fire, I think a good move is to trade UP, yes rare. Just the roster #s tell me 5 rookies and no more than 2 starters will make the team. I feel 5 is magic number.    QB- 2  BY, Pickett RB- 3   Chubba, Brooks(pls), etienne TE- 4   Sanders, Temble, Evans, Draft pick/major/franks/UDFA OL- 10   Walker, Lewis, Fortner, Hunt, Motown, Zavailla, Samac, Stone, Draft pick, Draft pick/Charles/carter WR-  6   Tmac, XL, Coker, Metch, Horn, Tremay   offense=  25 with 3 draft picks   DL-  6   Brown, Brown, Wharton, Ray, Cam, Hunter/draft pick Ed-   5  Phillips, Nic, Prince, Jones, ST/incoom/hampton ILB-   5  Lloyd, Wallace, Bam, Claud, draft pick CB-    5 Horn, Jackson, Thor, Evans, draft pick/CSN/UDFA SS-  4  Scott, More, Ramsom, Sim   Defense = 25 with 2 picks   ST = known 3+o+d = 53 roster   SO I see only room for 5-6 with factoring in UDFA pool. That tells me to trade up! Bonus the 1st+3rd gets in front of TB yucs. Then use one of the 5ths+2nd to draft another target. That's your two starters and use the 4th, 5th and 6th for the development OTs and what ever the best player are at the pick/DB. The last couple years they have added 2-3 UDFA each year, maybe the same this year too. Soooooooo Im normally 95% trade back, but above made me change my mind. I do not want to waive 5th rounder, I feel thats high with players on the bench.    ?? There's waiver claims too, they have done that each year.     
    • Big game tonight. Please send the annoying ass bandwagon New York fans home sad
×
×
  • Create New...