Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Josh Norris' Big Board


*FreeFua*

Recommended Posts

Interesting seeing who he has as his number 8 overall prospect...

Either Josh Norris comes on the huddle and reads my posts or you mouth breathers need to start listening when I speak. Im kidding, but anyway it's different than most big boards and imo better than most. A name not in the top 32 is the huddle's draft crush Derek Barnett. Another guy that I've said isn't as good as many on here think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

McDowell is a talent. Question is whether he can remain motivated and consistent.

Likely drops to the second round, ans wouldn't mind us hitting him there.

Yeah most mocks have him going in the 2nd now. If we could get him at 40 wow!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yeah most mocks have him going in the 2nd now. If we could get him at 40 wow!

He completely screwed up his interview according to some GMs, as one commented it was "the worst interview he's ever heard in his entire career."

Definitely dropping, maybe even to our last 2nd round pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, 15 said:

I usually like Norris' stuff but some of these analysis are getting way too ridiculous with their big boards, putting up names of guys they have crushes on way too fuggin high. get real bro. 

Yeah I mean some of these guys are going to have to get creative for the sake of generating clicks as well. He puts up a big board the same as everyone else's and no one looks twice. 

With that said, Malik's a top 10 talent whatever off field crap he has aside 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

OJ Howard overrated to the max. I'd mutiny if we're stupid enough to take him at 8 in the deepest TE class since forever.

I think you're the stupid one if you think Howard is overrated. I'm also willing to bet you go full retard if we pick him or not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Snake said:

I think you're the stupid one if you think Howard is overrated. I'm also willing to bet you go full retard if we pick him or not. 

Show me his film, and tell me how his film shows he'll be a dominating monster rather than some lug that doesn't get YAC or catches as well as the other athletic TEs from this deep class.

Like I said, this is a deep TE class. No value in picking one with the top 8 pick in this draft when we could get someone who'd have similar or better production.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Interesting seeing who he has as his number 8 overall prospect...

Either Josh Norris comes on the huddle and reads my posts or you mouth breathers need to start listening when I speak. Im kidding, but anyway it's different than most big boards and imo better than most. A name not in the top 32 is the huddle's draft crush Derek Barnett. Another guy that I've said isn't as good as many on here think.

https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl-draft/

Opinions are like aholes, everyone's got one.

Barnett is still #3 on PFF's big board.  Why is Josh Norris' better?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am trying to remember when I EVER said reach for need. My thing if someone falls you jump, if you can trade back a few slots and get help at the right value and pick up some ammo to move up from 51 which I think is outside the money zone, then you do that.   Take a WR later. Plenty of capable WRs have come from the 3rd round. Though this year I would go for C there if there was a reasonable choice. Take a TE if you must. I see more reason to take WR than TE. I think you give guys drafted two years ago and last year a chance to develop before cancelling them.    I think it is kind of unrealistic to throw everything all in on offense in hopes of going deep in the playoffs after an 8-10 year, even if it did have some nice bright spots in it.    And outside of this argument but relevant to it, I am bothered by Canales and Morgan and their apparent posture that we have arrived and are now in the big boy club. I don’t know where that comes from. They are out there talking like they are winners at 8-10. Backing into the playoffs in a real convoluted tie breaker scenario. They had some good games, yes. But the big feather n the cap, the LA Rams matchups, did you see what the Rams did? They didn’t fire the coaches but they fired their defensive backs. Bryce beat them yes, and it was pretty, but it was kind of like the Bucs and Mike Evans picking on our decimated secondary in 2022. Someone (Wilks) went down for allowing that to happen and they went down in LA too.  Wr aren’t as good as a whole lot of homers think we are. Shore up the trenches.    I think too many fans buy into it because they are so starved for anything that looks like a winner. 
    • How exactly does one win OROY "by default"? Wouldn't winning the award mean that of the two, McMillon stayed strong the entire year while the other guy didn't and fizzled out? That's like saying Secretariat only won by default because the other horse stopped moving midway through the race. Absolutely zero logic in that statement, which makes me very glad that I've never really paid much attention to Walterfoozball.
    • I agree, teams in the past have fired the HC in order to retain a coach on staff...hell it happened to Mcderp this year, rams in the past and Im missing another.  The fall off for the Panthers team defense was huge once Mcderp leftd and Ron could not fix it even when he named himself DC. 
×
×
  • Create New...