Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

49ers Are 'Open For Business' For #2 Pick

bobsfoodbasics

By bobsfoodbasics,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted

It wouldn't cost NEAR what the trade chart says since they are so desperate and any additional assets is better than none, but I'm still not sure.  Maybe 8, 40, and 64 for 2 and Tartt, if we ensure we get our man.  I don't want to give up a pick next year since we're already down one but maybe our 1st for their 2nd next year could be swapped since they'll likely only be a few spots away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted

Honestly, if we traded our entire draft this year and did not touch next years draft we would getting a bargain (it should cost us more).  It is stupid expensive and IMO would be for ONLY Garrett and personally I don't think he is worth it either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted

I wonder if it's SF putting rumors about the Browns wanting a QB at 1. I know Schefter reported it, but he said 1 NFL Exec said it, so what if it's SF saying it in order to entice more teams to consider it. 

The only player that I would pay a king's ransom for at #2 would be Garrett. I'd love Fournette, Adams or Hooker, but not for the pricetag it would cost. 

By the same token, the Browns always seem to go full Browns and f it up some how, so I also wouldn't be surprised if Cleveland drafts Trubisky or Watson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
50 minutes ago, rodeo said:

Combined with that report that Garrett may not go 1st overall, I would be happy with moving up. But not for Fournette.

If the Browns pull a Browns and pass on Garrett I'd love to get him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
t96 Grand Master

t96

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Honestly, if we traded our entire draft this year and did not touch next years draft we would getting a bargain (it should cost us more).  It is stupid expensive and IMO would be for ONLY Garrett and personally I don't think he is worth it either.

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
14 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Yeah, I hear you.  For Garrett its tasty but giving up next years one is risky as it gets.  Cannot imagine having Garrett here though.  Wow.  I would have to believe that SF would want very close to what Philly gave last year and that is just way too much.

I did notice an interesting stat:  Garrett had 8.5 sacks last yr but 4.5 came against UT San Antonio.  Feels like a sack master would have more production.  Just saying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Marguide Newbie

Marguide

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

Not even close. First of all, next year's first is considered to equal a second this year. Go check the chart and you will see how far you are from reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nails Newbie

Nails

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Yeah, I hear you.  For Garrett its tasty but giving up next years one is risky as it gets.  Cannot imagine having Garrett here though.  Wow.  I would have to believe that SF would want very close to what Philly gave last year and that is just way too much.

I did notice an interesting stat:  Garrett had 8.5 sacks last yr but 4.5 came against UT San Antonio.  Feels like a sack master would have more production.  Just saying.

They're not getting what Philly gave up or even close.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
E CaT PanTHer 2 Newbie

E CaT PanTHer 2

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

8 this year and next year's first could get up to 2. I'd definitely consider that. Would be getting game changing best player in draft AND still have our 2nd rounders and comp pick to add solid depth or possible starters in this deep draft. Ideally would only be losing pick 32 next year too.

haha i like your thinking

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • thunderraiden
      Clowney on Bryce Young

      By thunderraiden · Posted

      This thread really shows who the morons are, dude hasn't been around bryce for more than 24hours when this was reported and people with low iq still took it and ran with it. Glad to finally see people expose themselves.
    • NorthTryon
      How the Carolina Panthers found themselves in the worst situation

      By NorthTryon · Posted

      Racism. I know it's taboo to discuss, but yeah it, it's racism. 
    • hepcat
      Is Charlotte the worst sports city right now?

      By hepcat · Posted

      Is right now the worst time in the history of Charlotte pro sports? The Hornets (formerly Bobcats) have been a dumpster fire since rejoining the NBA 20 years ago. The Panthers were a respectable but frustrating team before David Tepper bought the team, but now they are easily the worst team in the NFL. Charlotte only has 2 sports teams so it's unfair to compare to every other city in the country with a Big 4 pro sports team, because when you have all 4 of even 3, you tend to have one franchise that ends up being successful. If we're taking into account the Hurricanes and ranking NC's pro sports teams as a whole, the Hurricanes make everything look better in NC pro sports. But just taking into account cities with an NFL and NBA team, and excluding their respective NHL and MLB teams, in the last 5 years, Charlotte easily takes the crown for the worst city for pro sports. The only other city coming close is Detroit since the Pistons have been awful, but the Lions were in the NFC Championship last year and should probably have made it to the Superbowl if it weren't for some questionable coaching decisions. Indianapolis could be mentioned because the Colts and Pacers have had a somewhat rough go the last 5 years, but both the Colts and Pacers have had more recent success than either the Panthers or Hornets. Sadly enough I think the Panthers have a better shot at success than the Hornets since the NBA is structured more towards star player driven success and the NFL is a team driven sport where there is more parity year to year. But I'm fairly confident this level of misery will continue for some time. 
×
×
  • Create New...