Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Day 2017


Recommended Posts

I can't remember a draft where we (the huddle) were so spread out in our opinions.

Week after week front running draft pick names have changed.

When this mess started Guys like Soloman Thomas and Myles Garrett were long gone to us and Fournette was moments away from signing a contract with us.

Recently I saw a mock where we selected Thomas and other where Garrett fell all the way to the Tampa Bay Bucs and the majority of Mock drafts has Jacksonville taking Fournette.  This has been done a couple times recently but

My sequence of players I would like to see us draft is.   We will have our pick of two of these players. Draft day we'll find out which two.

Garrett

Thomas

Adams

Fournette

Howard

McCaffrey

Allen

Hooker

Lattimore

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I ruled out Barnett, until we met with him. But he is a high character guy, a leader and a high motor producer. He faced the same talent as Garrett and came away with a better overall resume on, arguably, a weaker team (nobody is calling A&M a powerhouse, though)

Furthermore, I hear "love of the game" questions about Garrett

If say:
Adams
Fournette
Thomas
Barnett
Garrett
Howard
Lattimore
Hooker
Allen
McCaffrey

We have met with the top 4, hence Garretts slide... and DGs comments about wanting someone who hates to lose.

Lattimore due to the word that we want to play more man.

Hooker and Allen low since we didn't meet with them.

McCaffrey low because... well, that's a long debate... but let's just call it scheme fit.



Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally think Thomas is a better prospect than Garrett. He's a lot more valuable since he can play inside and outside if needed. But that's just me. I see Garrett as a one trick pony, I don't see the Julius peppers comparisons though. Other than size, he didn't show up against huge programs and really feasted on weaker schools. Barnett was better statistically. I'm guessing his hype is more of a fascination over his freaking athleticism than his production. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lasus83. said:

I ruled out Barnett, until we met with him. But he is a high character guy, a leader and a high motor producer. He faced the same talent as Garrett and came away with a better overall resume on, arguably, a weaker team (nobody is calling A&M a powerhouse, though)

Furthermore, I hear "love of the game" questions about Garrett

If say:
Adams
Fournette
Thomas
Barnett
Garrett
Howard
Lattimore
Hooker
Allen
McCaffrey

We have met with the top 4, hence Garretts slide... and DGs comments about wanting someone who hates to lose.

Lattimore due to the word that we want to play more man.

Hooker and Allen low since we didn't meet with them.

McCaffrey low because... well, that's a long debate... but let's just call it scheme fit.



Sent using the amazing CarolinaHuddle mobile app
 

Tennessee was loaded on paper but suffered a catastrophic spate of injuries which included 5 star defensive linemen Tuttle and McKenzie, as well as soon to be 2017 draft picks LB Reeves Maybin and CB Sutton among others.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

And Fournette no where to be found.   This must be the same folks that voted for Hillary.  Out of touch with reality.

They're just throwing stuff out there at this point haha. Hard to see us going Qb in the first or second but 3rd or later? Why not? I wouldn't mind taking a flyer on QB and Tackle every draft. Good ones are hard to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...