Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3-4 college outside backers who can translate to 4-3 DE's


panther4life

Recommended Posts

Gettleman made mention of that, when asked about the dropoff after Garrett and Thomas. I've never even considered a 3-4 backer at 8 but the PC makes me think its possible and if not there, certainly at any point in the draft.

Any names you guys think would be good fits?  I've got time to kill and would like to check out any names you guys can think of on draftbreakdown.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, *FreeFua* said:

Same

Same, same.

A lot of scouts don't like him though. They say he's a straight line speed guy with very little bend and won't be able to simply run around NFL tackles like he did in college. I don't know myself as I haven't looked into him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

Charles Harris and TJ Watt are two others I think fit the bill.

TJ Watt pops out even when you aren't watching him specifically. I love using draftbreakdown.com to get up to speed since, I don't watch college outside of bowl games and elite teams matched up in the regular season. Anyway I can't remember the specific prospects I was watching (obviously offensive guys going against Wisconsin's D). That kid is a freaking a player and would not be mad at all if we took him at some point after 8. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, panther4life said:

TJ Watt pops out even when you aren't watching him specifically. I love using draftbreakdown.com to get up to speed since, I don't watch college outside of bowl games and elite teams matched up in the regular season. Anyway I can't remember the specific prospects I was watching (obviously offensive guys going against Wisconsin's D). That kid is a freaking a player and would not be mad at all if we took him at some point after 8. 

I agree. I think that Watt would be an excellent DE in a 4-3. 

Draftbreakdown is awesome. I use it every draft season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, XClown1986 said:

I agree. I think that Watt would be an excellent DE in a 4-3. 

Draftbreakdown is awesome. I use it every draft season. 

Agreed. Its amazing. I still like having the media experts point me in the right direction and help me narrow the list of who I should look at it, but I prefer my own eyes over the scouting reports. Seems many of these guys try to cram to many players too late and make false projection's because they want to go on record on 100+ prospects. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also want to add, another thing I found very cool for fans of draft breakdown.com 

If you click to watch the videos on youtube vs through draft breakdown.com you can copy and paste the youtube link into gif.com. From there you can create as many gifs as you want. I've got some really good gif's on Corey Davis I've made doing that and I am far from technically savvy on the internet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Over previous years? Sure is 😆
    • An odd little vibe I've noticed here of late: some folks are "all or nothing" to an absolutely extreme level when it comes to Bryce. Here's a bit of truth telling though: There are, in fact, things Bryce does well. Likewise, there are areas in which he's improved over his time here. He has, on several occasions now, legitimately helped us win games. On the flipside, there have been failures in other areas as well as coaching that we're not in any way his fault.  And finally , it is also genuinely possible that the team may see him as the future, even if we don't. The craziest part, though? It's actually possible that they're right and we're wrong. All of this is true, and more, yet if you accept any of these premises people go from zero to apesh-t in under three seconds 😳 Anything less than total disavowal of Bryce and / or agreement that he's the worst QB of all time and suddenly you're a "stan". Oy 🙄 The reality though?  Bryce is indeed an NFL quarterback. Not a great one, probably backup level good, and I've seen way worse. Now, if you run that statement through your personal Google translator and it comes back with some version of "I want to throw 50 million a year at Bryce for the next 10 years", that's not really my issue it's yours  I don't wanna make him the franchise quarterback, but it's not my call. Win or lose, the team is going to do what they think is best. And as always, if it disagrees with what I think we should do, I'm gonna hope I'm the one who's wrong. Internet clout means nothing. Watching my favorite team win at my favorite sport meas fun 😁
×
×
  • Create New...