Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rumor: Bengals And Panthers Competing For #2 Overall Pick. Panthers Have Current Lead & Offer.


Saca312

Recommended Posts

Just now, SOJA said:

this is a false dichotomy. mid first round =/= crap just as number 2 pick =/= amazing.

You are never one player away and lord knows we need the depth and talent two seconds and a first can provide 

what this board wants is a bunch of rejects they can hype up and get all excited for who will wash out in 4 years time.

You choose one blue chip star over 3 "adequate role players" every day every time.

 

thus is the point behind using free agency to fill needs 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

if the browns take trubisky then the Ninets would simply take Garrett and would withdraw any offers made

 

do you people not think

I think its going to be cleveland 1-2 taking Garrett/ Trubisky (makes the most sense with the amount of pick they have rather get value than quanity now)

2 other QBs will be taken in top 15

 Fournette at 8  &  then a trade up scenario 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this team didn't go through what it went through last year to come away with some garbage like Derek Barnett or mike Williams and a mid round "solid locker room role mode with a great lunchpail."

 

You leave this draft with somebody who will reignite your franchise or you get gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

what this board wants is a bunch of rejects they can hype up and get all excited for who will wash out in 4 years time.

You choose one blue chip star over 3 "adequate role players" every day every time.

 

thus is the point behind using free agency to fill needs 

Yea because we've had so many rejects in the first three rounds that have washed out in their first four years under Gettleman...

also Fournette is not a blue chip star. He has injury issues, there are doubts of whether he is athletic enough, can catch out of the backfield well enough, not to mention the whole issue with tacking a RB in the top ten much less top two

I'm not saying Fournette won't be good but to act like he's a sure fire Pro-Bowler is silly

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Growl said:

this team didn't go through what it went through last year to come away with some garbage like Derek Barnett or mike Williams and a mid round "solid locker room role mode with a great lunchpail."

 

You leave this draft with somebody who will reignite your franchise or you get gone.

solid investment strategy. no way things could go wrong there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yup the casuals on Facebook ive gotten 85 laughing or angry emojis so far for pointing it out.  The amount of them throwing a fit because the canes were booed is insane  
    • Why are you so fixated on yards? Even if yards were a good judge of QB play, his low yardage totals in some of those games were partly a function of drops (looking at you Xavier Leggette…).  I’m not advocating that Bryce was elite for the last half of last year, but the eye test certainly supported high level QB play for large stretches. He made a lot of high difficulty, put it on the money/drop in the bucket throws. He converted on 3rd and 4th down, kept drives moving, and put the team in position to win games. And it’s not on him that the defense blew it late after he led game tying drives, Leggette dropped a game winning TD, or Chuba fumbled the ball in OT. We could have finished the season close to .500 with wins against 3 playoff teams including KC and Philly during that stretch largely due to Bryce’s play.    Has he sustained this level of play long enough to deserve an higher ranking? No. But for judging based in that stretch alone, he would. But whether he can perform more consistently at that level or build on that, and thus earns a higher ranking, remains to be seen. 
    • Totally agree with you, if we had invested in drafting a corner or two I wouldn’t even ponder adding Ramsey. But, to be honest we legit added nobody to our corner room this offseason we have nobody worth developing. Even if Chau Smith Wade is better then what I think, he is the only guy we have invested draft capital into outside of our starters.
×
×
  • Create New...