Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cut it out. Final warning.


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, TheRed said:

I'm sure you would say this after that verbal beatdown you were given after posting some of the worst social commentary the tinderbox has ever seen.

the Tinderbox used to be relevant. Now it's just the same 5-6 people sucking each other off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

the Tinderbox used to be relevant. Now it's just the same 5-6 people sucking each other off.

yup, just 5 to 6 people teaming up against anyone who has an opinion that differs from their own. 

they will do everything in their power to make sure you never post there again, and frankly speaking, they're mightily successful at it, in a very sad pathetic way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, cookinbrak said:

the Tinderbox used to be relevant. Now it's just the same 5-6 people sucking each other off.

 

5 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

yup, just 5 to 6 people teaming up against anyone who has an opinion that differs from their own. 

they will do everything in their power to make sure you never post there again, and frankly speaking, they're mightily successful at it, in a very sad pathetic way. 

isn't it funny how the tinderbox suddenly got so bad and stopped being relevant perfectly correlated with trump being a massive fug-up?

all last year the tinderbox was super active and populated split 50/50 trump and anti-trump. then he won and got into office and immediately started shitting the bed.

"ummm actually, the tinderbox sux now"

(trump lies about inauguration crowd)

"yeah agree, the tinderbox sucks. let's go"

(trump quadruples obama's drone program after his supporters thought he'd be anti war)

"yeah i'm leaving, it's the tinderbox's fault"

there were about 5 trump supporters left in there, until the day trump jr. admitted to his treason meeting. most of the rest instantly disappeared and now there are literally only 2 trump supporters left willing to sit in there and try to defend the indefensible.

but i'm totally sure it has to do with the people and not being challenged on your views :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

is that really what you would consider a verbal beatdown? loll. 

come to the bay man. we'll show you how poo really gets down

 

7 hours ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

yup, just 5 to 6 people teaming up against anyone who has an opinion that differs from their own. 

they will do everything in their power to make sure you never post there again, and frankly speaking, they're mightily successful at it, in a very sad pathetic way. 

You could avoid of all this and actually attempt to process why people feel your views are so devoid of reason or empathy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheRed said:

 

You could avoid of all this and actually attempt to process why people feel your views are so devoid of reason or empathy.

many other people share the same sentiments as me, they're just not members on this board

remember, most issues facing our country today have Americans divided, almost down the middle, and police brutality is one of those. Try being more constructive and hearing the other side out instead of ganging up on the opposition in hopes they just disappear. I've been one of the more respectful civil posters on this board, but I haven't received the same treatment, especially now that my views on some topics are made pretty clear. 

and I'm not a hardheaded egotistical person. I like to hear arguments on both sides and process them in hopes that maybe I can learn from other people, advance my way of thinking, and maybe one day even change my views. But the way some people post in the tbox is not constructive at all, and that approach won't change any ones opinions, I can assure you that.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

many other people share the same sentiments as me, they're just not members on this board

remember, most issues facing our country today have Americans divided, almost down the middle, and police brutality is one of those. Try being more constructive and hearing the other side out instead of ganging up on the opposition in hopes they just disappear. I've been one of the more respectful civil posters on this board, but I haven't received the same treatment, especially now that my views on some topics are made pretty clear. 

and I'm not a hardheaded egotistical person. I like to hear arguments on both sides and process them in hopes that maybe I can learn from other people, advance my way of thinking, and maybe one day even change my views. But the way some people post in the tbox is not constructive at all, and that approach won't change any ones opinions, I can assure you that.    

The approach you received was mainly due to your unabashed appropriation of rap music while espousing views about the black community that align with white supremacists.

Attempting to blame someone else for such an ironic and unbelievably hypocritical stance tells me you've learned nothing since then. It's a pity really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, E CaT PanTHer 2 said:

many words

 

4 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Then more words

Take it to the tinderbox or drop it. If I see any more posts from either of you in this discussion,  you won't like what I do to both of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...