Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What you've all been waiting for!


Recommended Posts

http://www.heraldonline.com/247/story/1649131.html

From Darin Gantt:

CHARLOTTE -- Of all the things the Carolina Panthers learned during their bye week, the one thing they have to fix is clear.

“Yeah, we pretty much have to get back to running the ball,” left tackle Jordan Gross said, plainly stating one of the root causes of the team's 0-3 start.

A year ago, the Panthers boasted one of the most productive running games in the league. Part of that was talent, with DeAngelo Williams and Jonathan Stewart and one of the league's best lines.

PANTHERS_FALCONS_312 PANTHERS_FALCONS_309

File, David T. Foster IIIThe Charlotte Observer - Carolina's DeAngelo Williams spins away from Atlanta Falcons defenders during a Sept. 20 game in Atlanta.

CLICK FOR MORE PHOTOS

* PANTHERS_FALCONS_312

* PANTHERS_FALCONS_309

But mostly, they ran well because they ran often.

In 2008, they averaged 31.5 rushing attempts per game, sixth-most in the league. At the same time, they averaged just 25.9 pass attempts per game, fewest in the league.

This year, they've flipped the script — 27th in rush attempts (23.7 per game) and 8th in passes thrown (36.0).

With everything, there's a condition. The Panthers have played from behind in two of their three losses, and four straight three-and-outs in the second half against Dallas stemmed from their lack of success running the ball.

“Every game takes on its own personality,” Panthers coach John Fox said of the Dallas game, in which the team ran just 16 times, six in the second half. “We were in a lot of two-minute situations or no-huddle situations. Right before the half, there weren't a lot of runs, and when you're down six and then down 14 late in the game, you're in a no-huddle situation.

“There is no doubt I think we are a run team first — and we remember that — but sometimes, situations in games dictate how many times you do run the ball. If you've got a 14-point lead with five minutes to go, you run the ball more than you pass it. That's not just true with our team; that's true with any team in the National Football League.”

Adding rushing attempts helps the Panthers across the board.

Most obviously, Williams and Stewart were big-play threats last year, with 28 rushing touchdowns between them, and 59 rushes of more than 10 yards.

Through three games, they have two scores, and just 10 such long runs. They have just one run longer than 17 yards on the season, a 28-yard burst by Stewart against the Falcons.

Beyond the immediate, there are the layered contributions the Panthers are missing.

Delhomme — and every quarterback, really — functions better when it's not all placed on his shoulders. Considering he has nine turnovers in three games, limiting his chances is wise. But with the Panthers more than most, being able to run often — as important as running well — is the key that makes their entire offense start.

Being able to run play-action to get the ball deep to Steve Smith is based on having the front seven softened up by a rushing attack. The problems with that are twofold, however. The Panthers haven't run as effectively as they did last year (4.3 yards per carry vs. 4.8 per last year), and their second and third receivers have struggled to get open. If teams are going to double-cover Smith, that means everyone else is singled. But Muhsin Muhammad has just 14 catches for 139 yards (9.9 per), and wideouts Kenny Moore and Dwayne Jarrett have five catches for 44 yards (8.8 per) between them.

That has allowed teams to leave a safety down, and running against eight-man fronts is a frustrating proposition, which throws off the Panthers' entire plan.

“That's not how we want this offense to run, but that's kind of how it was,” Delhomme said. “It's just the way it was, I don't know any other way to put it. They were sustaining the football, but when we had our opportunities, we weren't making the most of it. …

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right on. It seems this year (more than others) the Panthers are quick to abandon the run game and go to Delhomme. I would think that keeping the ball on the ground would be better. I for one would feel good about a 3 and out if you ran it every 3 downs. Its just no right....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They act like "getting back to running the ball" is some kind of MFing epiffany.

It's the only f**king thing you are built for.

*FACEPALM*

You said it!!!! And to Delhomme's comments I say "No freakin' kidding, Sherlock?!" How about adding 'making smarter decision with the football' to the equation? Or not forcing throws into triple and quadruple coverage? Sheesh!!!!

I swear, the crappy playcalling is making this team brain-dead. All the self-blame and asinine comments from the Panther's HC & players is getting really embarrassing and tired.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • For starters, and again I am not sure what his capacity is in the media or how connected he is to the team, but I posted above Al Wallace says he is "absolutely" getting 50+ a year and he deserves it.  I obviously strongly disagree with it but it feels like like season when the team is slow leaking info to gauge the temp.   Secondly nobody on Gods green earth is going to sign an extension making less than he is making now.  Thats just crazy talk.  
    • No. Physical tools alone aren't enough. There are plenty of examples of draft busts to support that. Aost all of them had the physical tools and that wasn't enough. But Bryce is a perfect example of the opposite. Absolutely elite intangibles aren't enough either. If you simply don't have the physical abilities all the football intelligence and work ethic in the world won't be enough to overcome it. Just look to the sidelines every Sunday. We call those people "coaches".
    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
×
×
  • Create New...