-
Welcome!
Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!
Or simply create a new Huddle account.
Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!
-
-
-
-
Topics
-
-
-
-
Posts
-
The intro to the article talked about how they picked the teams and it wasn't just on overall career, it was a factor, but their peak ability also factored in. He 100% should be on a roster like this, because it was building the best roster from players since 2000, not the best careers during that time. And no matter how you slice it, CMC's peak ability if he could have had a long healthy career would have made him one of the best RBs of all time. He had back to back seasons with over 1k rushing and 100 catches, with the 2nd of them also having over 1k receiving, that's wild. He's also still only 29 and I think is going to end up playing at least another 5-6 years as he's going to slowly shift into being a slot WR at some point I believe and basically become what Deebo was for the 49ers for a while. -
-
(1).thumb.gif.c991ead14106875ce4bbb9e20baa4b88.gif)
When the league shifted to 3 preseason games, most teams went to joint practices while playing starters less. They use that as more of a measuring stick than the games itself. Meanwhile teams are charging people to see these games with players that won't be on the roster in a couple weeks playing most of the minutes
-
-
.thumb.gif.1c66a9a8c48a4750eeb39deb609abe24.gif)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.