Panthers rank 6th in ESPN week 6 power rankings

[MVPccaffrey]

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/page/NFLpowerrankingsx171010/nfl-2017-week-6-power-rankings-kansas-city-chiefs-green-bay-packers-atlanta-falcons-lead-playoff-chances

 

If we beat Philly I think we'll move up to #3

[TheMaulClaw]

How in the hell are the Pats rated higher then we are?  We just beat them in their house.

[Porn Shop Clerk]

lol the cowboys at 9 these rankings are retarded

[jfra78]

12 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

How in the hell are the Pats rated higher then we are?  We just beat them in their house.

they are the pats until they are mathematically eliminated most "experts" will think they are going to be champs

[rayzor]

5 minutes ago, Porn Shop Clerk said:

lol the cowboys at 9 these rankings are retarded

yeah....didn't even bother looking at anything else after that.

idiots.

[rayzor]

from SB Nation:

Hope rankings, Week 6

#	Team	Last week
1	Kansas City Chiefs	2
2	Philadelphia Eagles	7
3	Carolina Panthers	8
4	Green Bay Packers	11
5	Jacksonville Jaguars	22
6	Seattle Seahawks	15
7	Washington	5
8	Detroit Lions	6
9	New York Jets	20
10	New England Patriots	19

[TheMaulClaw]

Just now, rayzor said:

from SB Nation:

Hope rankings, Week 6

#	Team	Last week
1	Kansas City Chiefs	2
2	Philadelphia Eagles	7
3	Carolina Panthers	8
4	Green Bay Packers	11
5	Jacksonville Jaguars	22
6	Seattle Seahawks	15
7	Washington	5
8	Detroit Lions	6
9	New York Jets	20
10	New England Patriots	19

Falcons not on the list?

[electro's horse]

3 minutes ago, TheMaulClaw said:

Falcons not on the list?

early bye, two embarrassingly close wins against the bears and lions.

[rayzor]

Just now, TheMaulClaw said:

Falcons not on the list?

they've got the falcons 12th...where they had them last week.

i'm not hating on that. they haven't looked all that strong.

surprising to jacksonville getting some love.

[rayzor]

1 minute ago, electro's horse said:

early bye, two embarrassingly close wins against the bears and lions.

yeah, i was thinking that sounded about right. they just don't look as good as the carry-over hype they've been getting from last year.

early bye probably isn't going to do them any favors as the season goes on, either.

[electro's horse]

3 minutes ago, rayzor said:

yeah, i was thinking that sounded about right. they just don't look as good as the carry-over hype they've been getting from last year.

early bye probably isn't going to do them any favors as the season goes on, either.

i mean they weren't going to be the third or fourth best offense in nfl history again

[rayzor]

washington post...

1. Kansas City Chiefs (5-0) | Last Week’s Rank: 1

2. Green Bay Packers (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 2

3. Philadelphia Eagles (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 5

4. Denver Broncos (3-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 4

5. Carolina Panthers (4-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 8

6. New England Patriots (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 9

7. Seattle Seahawks (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 13

8. Atlanta Falcons (3-1) | Last Week’s Rank: 11

9. Detroit Lions (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 6

10. Los Angeles Rams (3-2) | Last Week’s Rank: 7

 

[Ball4life]

43 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

early bye, two embarrassingly close wins against the bears and lions.

Reading this board you would have thought the Falcons lost to the Lions/Bears. Falcons controlled both of those games. 

Falcons didn't start blowing teams out until end of the year last year. Offense still looks dominant when healthy. 

[electro's horse]

1 minute ago, Ball4life said:

Reading this board you would have thought the Falcons lost to the Lions/Bears. Falcons controlled both of those games. 

Falcons didn't start blowing teams out until end of the year last year. Offense still looks dominant when healthy. 

Falcons didn't control poo against the bears what are you talking about.