Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Weak move by Jon Beason


scpanther22

Recommended Posts

Weak move by LB Jon Beason, not talking to reporters after the game.

He put himself out there Thursday during his paid appearance on WFNZ, challenging Peppers and saying he was taking his teammate out to dinner to talk about effort.

Then when it was time to address it after the game, he refused.

As much as calling out teammates on the radio rather than in person, ducking isn't something that leaders do.

Granted, Peppers didn't talk either, but that's nothing new with him. Can't remember another time Beason has.

-- For the record, WFNZ officials said Sunday night they expect Beason to be there for his weekly appearance Thursday. We'll see.

For what it's worth, Beason had the appearance of a kid who'd been called to the principal's office, and didn't want to dig himself a deeper hole by saying more.

Trust me, he's heard about this one from his superiors

http://www.heraldonline.com/665?plckController=Blog&plckBlogPage=BlogViewPost&insiteUserId=ded44479-eff0-4fb5-98bf-9edb9d130913&plckPostId=Blog%3aded44479-eff0-4fb5-98bf-9edb9d130913Post%3a37bf0e33-7de3-42be-8734-bb0427d95ea5&plckScript=blogScript&plckElementId=blogDest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really this is a cheap shot by Gantt. What is there to say anyway? It seemed to work and the whole D was fired up. They are really making this up to be way more then it is. If I was a players I would never talk to them. Its not like back in the day when Reporters were on the side of the players.

P.S Everyone is kicking your ass right now Gantt. Even Steve Reed is bring some good reporting now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...