Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Buc's Offense outranks Panthers

TerriblePizza

By TerriblePizza,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Argus Plexus Newbie

Argus Plexus

Posted
Posted

The Bucs MIGHT win against the Seahawks, seeing as how the Seahawks are REALLY suckin' it this year in comparison to several seasons ago. But I doubt it. They could easily go 0-16, but they might be able to pull a win out of their asses against Seattle.

NFC SOUTH IN 2009:

NO

ATL

CAR

TB

I don't lie. That will be it at the end of the season if the Panthers don't pull some wins out their asses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
X-Clown Veteran

X-Clown

Posted
Posted

The Bucs MIGHT win against the Seahawks, seeing as how the Seahawks are REALLY suckin' it this year in comparison to several seasons ago.

With a healthy Hasselbeck and the fact that the game is at Qwest Field, I don't see that happening. The Jaguars aren't world beaters (but they are better than Tampa) and Seattle just beat them 41-0.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bucman Newbie

bucman

Posted
Posted

Yeah, I guess falling back on your SB is the best thing to do when you've faced the fact that you're franchise is headed back into familiar territory(ie. the suck).

Big words coming from a Saints fan... When was the last time the Saints had a winning season again? :D

And mind you 8-8 is not a winning season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PuntJake Newbie

PuntJake

Posted
Posted

There's about a 95% chance that bucman has posted that same post at the boards of the 5 other teams that they've lost to so far this season.

Looking at the schedule though, the Bucs have a realistic shot of going 0-16.

CAR

NE

Bye

GB

@ MIA

NO

@ATL

@CAR

NYJ

@SEA

@NO

ATL

Can you honestly look at any of those games and see Tampa winning? I think their best shots were against Buffalo and Washington but we saw how that went.

i hadn't looked at their schedule. if they don't win against us now, we'll be better later in the season. how sweet would it be for them to go 0-16? i'd love it! :ciappa:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • MHS831
      Some homers' opinions of the OTs that we may realistically be able to get at 19

      By MHS831 · Posted

      You could say that-- but if we don't need a starting OT this year, why would you draft a flawed one that is not going to play? (We are coming from different underlying assumptions and perspectives--I see your argument and don't disagree with the premise) Your thinking is based on the assumption that an OT for the future is more important than immediate needs at other positions, or that we can meet other needs in later rounds even if we take the OT in round 1.  I do not think there is but 1 OT worthy of a first-round grade---they are mocked based on need and demand--if we do not have a need for a starter right now, a team at 18 may grab a T that is the 33rd best player--worth it if you have no starting T, but not if you have a starter.  So just because they are mocked around the middle of the first it does not mean that the players are good values--teams get desperate.  QBs are a great example.  Simpson may be worth it in round 1 for the Cardinals, but not the Jets, because they have Geno Smith.  Sure, they will need a QB by next year, but taking Simpson is a reach. I do not see our need, with 2 starters (Walker and Moton) and another possibly returning by the end of the season enough to justify ranking OT over positions like Safety, Will LB--I do not think we replaced A Shawn Robinson (We gonna put a NT out there?  Wharton (280lbs)?  So do we reach in round 1 for a player who may not play much or do we get a Will LB that can cover?  A deep free safety?  A quality center? A playmaking TE?  A DT to replace Robinson?  A wide receiver to balance the secondary?  Long term, if the right player was there, you would be right.  Short term, OT is a luxury at this point, in my view.  
    • strato
      Off-season topic: WWYD? Total Branding Redesign

      By strato · Posted

      Put Huey P Newton on the helmet. With his AK. 
    • csx
      Baldinger on the 2026 LB Class

      By csx · Posted

      We arent switching. Evero is 3-4 to the core. Given how 3-4 has been a noticeable characteristic of top defenses recently and we have drafted and signed players fir it  I dont know why anyone would think that's a good idea 
×
×
  • Create New...