Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

100% of Panthers will be for sale


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Not just Richardson's 48% share, the whole enchilada.

Full 100% of Panthers for sale

Quote

Panthers controlling owner Jerry Richardson owns only 48 percent of the franchise. But much more than 48 percent of the team will be for sale.

According to the team, the full 100 percent of the franchise’s equity will be available, when the team is placed on the market after the 2017 season ends.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, brandon_87 said:

I mean... When the "team" is for sale, I'd think the whole team....not just a %

Richardson only owns about 47-48% of the team. The remaining shares are divided among several people.

This means whoever's buying the team is gonna have to pay full price.

Also means those other owners are gonna be out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ickmule said:

Well, I don’t feel good about this any longer   

I feel even BETTER about this.  Whoever buys the team will need MAJOR cheese and have the $$$ to fund the best staff/FO he can, invest in an indoor practice facility, etc. or risk taking a hit on their already overpriced investment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Richardson only owns about 47-48% of the team. The remaining shares are divided among several people.

This means whoever's buying the team is gonna have to pay full price.

Also means those other owners are gonna be out.

I understand that completely, just wouldn't ever think someone would publicly say a team is for sale unless it was all of it, if it was just his shares, it'd be done behind closed doors for sure

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Most EVs are in the 90+ e-MPG meaning some measurement house somewhere compares the EV to a similar ICE model and works out how much is costs to charge (on average) versus fill up as a point of comparison. Talking long term, in the hundreds of thousands of miles?  No clue.  Some early signs are that EV batteries maintain 80% charge over 400k miles.  So there's that.   The challenge and charm of an ICE vehicle is being able to park it under a tree, get your jack stands out and tinker with your engine.  There's just not that same level of complexity in an EV.  I saw someone estimate there are 200 or so moving parts in an EV, and 2000 in an ICE vehicle.  I'm not a part counter so I can't really speak to that. I think that the EV is more the future than any type of combustion engine.  Those will still be around in specific purposes, but for most people - an EV will be the superior option in terms of efficiency.  I say that as someone who loves stupid horsepower numbers out of turbo 4 bangers and inline 6s...  I am one of those tinkers when I can be. A bigger issue for EVs is going to be the ownership versus lease.  Right now, there are INSANE leases on EVs, which is great, but what do you have at the end of that lease?  Nada, maybe some equity if you're lucky.  Where as I'm almost done paying for my car, and plan to keep it until the wheels fall off (or my son wrecks it when he starts to drive).  Will EV makers do the smartphone thing and build in planned obsolesce?  Stop updating software?  I love the tech in EVs, and I think getting more cars and trucks off the road is a good thing.  But I am still just a little concerned.  Capitalism has gotten far too extractive.  
    • Blacksheer's time was up when they drafted Etienne. 
×
×
  • Create New...