Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Confirmed: Giants will NOT pursue Steve Wilks


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Related Note: Mara reportedly talked to Belichick regarding coaches. Belichick recommended Schwartz.

There's some speculation that Belichick did that to keep them from sniffing around Josh McDaniels. And yeah, I think we all know he's capable of pulling that kind of BS.

nothing to see here...Image result for jedi mind tricks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SZ James (banned) said:

oh I must have missed the confirmation part since it wasn't in the OP

It's per the linked story by Ralph Vacchiano.

The team says they want an experienced head coach. Wilks isn't that.

They say they might be willing to take a longtime coordinator, but Wilks isn't that either.

So basically, unless they go back on the statements they've made, Wilks is not an option.

Says nothing good or bad about Wilks. Just means he's a different kind of coach than they want.

Doesnt guarantee we keep him, though. Just means it's highly unlikely his head coaching opportunity is gonna be with the Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Thia is guaranteed by recent team statements (link)

Team ownership has stated that they want one of two things in a head coach:

1) Someone who's been a head coach before

2) Someone who's been a coordinator for an extended time

Wilks is neither of those things.

Mind you, this doesn't guarantee that somebody else won't go after him, but if Wilks is coaching another NFL team next year, it won't be the Giants.

usatsi_8391294.jpg?w=1000&h=600&crop=1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's per the linked story by Ralph Vacchiano.

The team says they want an experienced head coach. Wilks isn't that.

They say they might be willing to take a longtime coordinator, but Wilks isn't that either.

So basically, unless they go back on the statements they've made, Wilks is not an option.

Says nothing good or bad about Wilks. Just means he's a different kind of coach than they want.

Doesnt guarantee we keep him, though. Just means it's highly unlikely his head coaching opportunity is gonna be with the Giants.

So, not confirmed, just highly unlikely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Neither Barkley nor even a healthy CMC would move the needle much for us. Those are guys that impact teams that already have impressive overall offenses and defenses, so they can perform the complimentary roles that make them actually valuable. We should know that specifically because CMC almost never moved the needle on bad Panthers team after bad Panthers team. Ask Giants fans about that with Saquon.
    • I would generally disagree. You see a lot more load management than previously but that is because being healthy in the playoffs is such a key factor. Different philosophies in that regard than previous generations.  Baseball really doesn't matter until at least halfway through the season. I am not gonna say they don't play hard but the physical demands are infinitesimal in the MLB in comparison to basically any other major pro sport.  People dislike all the shooting these days but that's a direct correlation with how much the overall skill level of the average NBA player has drastically risen over the past 15ish years. There are other aggravating factors, certainly, but that is the biggest one in terms of playing style differences. So many of the guys from the 80's and 90's wouldn't even be able to play in the modern NBA at all. The biggest problem the NBA has with the American market(they are the only US sport that has any real international appeal or interest, minus the NHL) is that they are so steadily corrupt and fix the systems against the small market teams. Well, you eventually lose a big chunk of the league viewership/potential viewership in the process. Take the very obviously fixed NBA draft lotteries. Superstar and upper tier star players rarely want to play for small market teams, nor can they usually afford to pay them. So how do you expect them to possibly compete in that environment?
    • The Tsar awaits...
×
×
  • Create New...