Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Thought this would be entertaining


NeedSumD

Recommended Posts

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Fox007 said:

Dan Marino isn't even 1% higher than Cam and literally every 30 for 30 you see where they interview a QB that QB says Dan is the best pure passer ever.

Facts indeed.

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Actually you did nothing but reinforce the fact that stats arent everything. Look whoelse is on that list, Marino,  mcnabb, warren moon. HOF Qbs with the same completion percentage as Cam. Somebody must of missed the memo on those guys huh? Good job buddy, you gave us some facts alright.

I wonder what all the guys you just mentioned have in common :thinking:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

LOL...percentage isnt the same as accumulated yards. You only rack up yards with more time in the league. Cam is just 28 in 7 seasons not a retired 15 plus year vet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, thomas96 said:

Cam plays in a system where he'll never be a high percentage passer, and no QB in this system would. Tons of modern QBs now are throwing 65% plus easily in these WC style systems. Completion percentage is a really stupid stat to look at when judging QB play.

His completion percentage could easily be 5 points higher if he would just simply hit the wide open check down like the one he repeatedly ignores every game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, NeedSumD said:

Yeah 62,000 yards and 25,000 yards yeah You got me there.   

Look at this retarded piece of poo compare 17 years of yards to 7 and not even total yards(missing TDs for a reason too) after derping the first comparison. You're a Paramecium brained Neanderthal with a fat tub of lard for a mom.

PAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
    • You're really gonna pass up the opportunity to make a joke about skidmarks in underwear here?  Alright fine.
×
×
  • Create New...