Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some of that Kalil $ could have gone toward keeping Norwell


top dawg

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually did a search for mentions of Eric Shelton in the last week.  The only one that came up was yours.

My recent focus has been on coaching hires.  That's what I'm interested in right now, plus of course any information about the sale of the team.

I mention Hurney occasionally, but I'd be willing to bet I cuold find at least a dozen posts (and probably more) where you talk about Gettleman for every one mention of Hurney.  Gettleman and Newton seem to be the only things you ever want to talk about.  And it's pretty clear you either just wanna argue with people or you're absolutely obsessed with both.

Rum's right.  It's tiresome, and it's boring.

Find some new material. dude.

 

 In the recent past, Scot has been a wealth of knowledge on coaching changes--thnxk Scot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, TheRed said:

We acquired both Johnson and Shepard as a response to losing Ginn. Their special team value was supposed to be a bonus. But primarily we wanted them for their speed in the passing game. Suggesting we paid them to be a 5th or 6th option is just revisionist history. We signed them expecting an impact.

Which of Benjamin, Funchess, Olsen, McCaffrey, and Samuel do you believe we had him above in terms of targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Toomers said:

   Jeremy needs to pin this to the top of the board so people will stop using term “out” or “escape” when referring to Matt Kalil’s contract.

 

 Matt Kalil will cost 14.7M dead money if we cut him AFTER this season. That’s not an escape, it’s a brick to the back of the head. 

  

As I said the minute he signed.....”This is a dark day in Panthers history”.

When we signed him, we felt he had potential.

He may still get better, possibly to the point his value equals his contract.

If not, we can spread the dead cap hit over two years.  Not ideal, but if his replacement is Moton or someone else we pick this year, our LT salary hit will not be that bad.  Add 1-1.5 mil to the 7.3 in dead cap.

The real downside is if he is still not the answer after 2018, we will not be able to replace him with a high priced free agent.

But you can have some dead cap and still succeed.  The eagles had 11.6m in dead cap this year (Daniel and Bradford) and they're in the freaking superb owl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Toomers said:

   Jeremy needs to pin this to the top of the board so people will stop using term “out” or “escape” when referring to Matt Kalil’s contract.

 

 Matt Kalil will cost 14.7M dead money if we cut him AFTER this season. That’s not an escape, it’s a brick to the back of the head. 

  

As I said the minute he signed.....”This is a dark day in Panthers history”.

If that's correct,  then it's terrible.  Absolutely terrible! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheCasillas said:

yea..... you nailed it...... lol

Riley : https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/riley-reiff/7029

Kalil: https://www.profootballfocus.com/nfl/players/matt-kalil/7010

both are not good and overpaid. But at least one has an escape after year 2 ;)

Well,  if I wasn't  so preoccupied trying to work,  I would have said that just because the market is filled with suspect LTs doesn't mean that you have to pay the normal going rate to anyone.  You let some other person do that,  and then you look for a value, even a Band-Aid if necessary. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, top dawg said:

If that's correct,  then it's terrible.  Absolutely terrible! 

It's not correct. The contract is more complex than most here can understand. There would be dead money in 2019 but it'd be about $7M, and it'd only be 2019. His cap hit this year was approx. $3M and his cap hit next year is $7M. So it will have basically been a 2 year $17M deal but with the cap hit spread over 3 seasons. It wasn't a good signing, unless he starts playing at a high level this year (unlikely) you will not ever see me defend signing Matt Kalil. Whether it was DG or JR, I don't know and at this point don't care since it doesn't matter. But the contract was nowhere near as bad as some people think it was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
    • Reasonable. I mean I didn’t see a clear path to relief this season myself. As I have typed already, I think the QB FA class is more interesting next season and that draft is supposed to be stacked as well. There just weren’t many options this year.  When you have Tepper to contend with you have to tread lightly around this unless you are 100% certain and willIng to stake your job on it.   There were a couple of outings that helped Bryce a lot in terms of  thinking maybe he can do this, and if you are a supporter you are giving them a lot of weight. You are likely to think just get him some more help and he can do that every week. Which I think Tepper falls into that category.  And the playoffs, division champs, regardless of the way I see that, the supporters will also give that a lot of weight.    And the big one, the atmosphere In BOA for that WC game, Tepper had to be soiling himself over that. If you pulled Bryce out right now you had better be right and your new guy had better make the playoffs and look good doing it or you will be gone and your chance to build your old team back into respectability will be gone too.  So here we have Pickett on a one year deal, and Grier and King. I understand it.  
×
×
  • Create New...