Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Monster Hunter world


carpanfan96

Recommended Posts

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, RealBitsOfPanther said:

I'm really enjoying it. It's my first MH game so it's a little overwhelming at first, but once you play a couple of hours, you start figuring things out pretty quick. 

It definitely is but less so then previous games, if your on PS4 my ID is Ch40t1cd3lusi0ns

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, d-dave said:

I'm thinking about it.  It looks pretty cool.  The system seem really deep though.  I just don't think I'd have the time to really dig into until the summer.  The graphics are pretty intense, and the AI looks to make an interesting game.

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Zaximus said:

My mind wants me to buy this game and play it.    I've never played these games though and I feel I may not want to grind as much as that's needed, but then again, I feel like grinding half the time haha.    I may end up getting it if some friends do.

 

It's definitely worth getting, it's less grindy then the previous entry's in the series but there's still a bit of grinding involved for armour and weapon building. I've got it on ps4, had to sell my gaming pc sadly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, SOJA said:

hadn't seen much about this till this thread, might get into this when I have more time

question to carpanfan bc you seem to know a lot, is multiplayer required or are you able to beat most of the game solo?

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

You're able to beat the game solo, no problems. It's built around the online play but it isn't intrusive on the gameplay. There's nice touches like the SOS flare if you run into problems with a quest and want to ask the online players to help you. So it's really dependant on how you want to play, most of the gameplay is a loop. Go on this quest to kill this monster, use loot from monster to make better gear, a little grind since you need to kill a monster more then once to make a set of armour or such. 

 

Short and simple, you can play solo all the way through or with 3 friends. I've gone online once and I've done 17-20 missions so far. 

 

hopefully that helps some but I can't recommend this game enough. I've had the Flu the last 3-4 days and I've put about 19-20 hours in so far with it. Nothing quite like the feeling you get when your fighting a T-Rex like Monster and then a bigger Dragon like Monster drops in and starts attacking both of you with swoop attacks, charges and fire breathing attacks while you're rolling this way and that way trying not to get poisoned or burned and trying to place nicely timed attacks in between the chaos. 

thanks so much for the writeup

flu is absolutely awful this year, get better soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/29/2018 at 2:24 PM, carpanfan96 said:

It's pretty time consuming, especially if your hunting achievements. Most monsters or quests take between 15-45m each and there's hundreds of side quests, investigations, and other types of things to do quest wise plus over 50 monsters with more on the way plus the main story line. 

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, d-dave said:

Thanks for all your input in the thread!  This does look like an amazing game.  Summer for sure =)

Good luck recovering, heard this was a pain in the tail flu season.

It is a very amazing game,but I've been playing MH for about 10 years so i might be a bit biased. I can say for sure this one fixes a lot of nitpicky issues ive had with previous entries. Probably my favorite game ive played over the last two or three years and isn't that close expect for maybe BOTW. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...