Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eric Washington does not believe Vernon Butler can replace Star


TheSpecialJuan

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Montsta said:

I believe without a doubt we will lose Star to free agency, but I don’t think anyone with any sense would tell an impending FA we want to keep that he is easily replaced. 

Even if they did, it wouldn't be true.

Star is better than a lot of people give him credit for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

And I'm fine with letting them walk, we need those comp picks. Our roster has gotten old in the last few seasons. 

 

Bro this narrative just doesn't work.  If we let them both walk and get pretty much nothing in FA, we would have a good amount of cap room, but an lesser roster, when we are trying to get a better roster. 

I.E... we won't get two comp picks for them because we will sign peeps in FA (most notably a WR or two, along with a Safety (or two)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, weyco2000 said:

Didn’t say they were, but 6 solo tackles? What next he draws a double team every snap? 

Star's biggest duties are to clog running lanes, to help collapse the pocket so the quarterback can't step up, and to occupy blockers so they can't get to Luke Kuechly.

If you look back at Ray Lewis in Baltimore, he became less effective when he didn't have huge, space eating tackles in front of him.  He lobbied the team to get someone big in front of him again and they drafted Haloti Ngata.  Lewis went back to being dominant and the Ravens were back in the Super Bowl within a few years.

If Butler or someone else isn't able to effectively replace Lotulelei, Kuechly's performance is likely to suffer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Star's biggest duties are to clog running lanes, to help collapse the pocket so the quarterback can't step up, and to occupy blockers so they can't get to Luke Kuechly.

If you look back at Ray Lewis in Baltimore, he became less effective when he didn't have huge, space eating tackles in front of him.  He lobbied the team to get someone big in front of him again and they drafted Haloti Ngata.  Lewis went back to being dominant and the Ravens were back in the Super Bowl within a few years.

If Butler or someone else isn't able to effectively replace Lotulelei, Kuechly's performance is likely to suffer.

I understand all of what you just said, does  he? You expect a starter to make at least one play a game, I don’t recall Starr making one.... all year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weyco2000 said:

I understand all of what you just said, does  he? You expect a starter to make at least one play a game, I don’t recall Starr making one.... all year. 

Not at nose tackle, honestly.  They're way more likely to play a part in someone else making a big play.

I'll put it this way: There's a reason why another team is likely gonna pay him more than we can afford.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Vernon Butler really impressed me near the end of the season. He started getting a bit more snaps from 1-tech and seriously looked good.

I still think Butler’s more fit to be a UT (Kawann’s role) more-so than Star’s, but even then I think he could replace Star.

I’d just rather us keep Norwell first and foremost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, weyco2000 said:

I understand all of what you just said, does  he? You expect a starter to make at least one play a game, I don’t recall Starr making one.... all year. 

Huh?

I could point to a myriad of instances where Star literally mauls down two 300+ lb linemen to stuff the backfield.

He definitely had an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not at nose tackle, honestly.  They're way more likely to play a part in someone else making a big play.

I'll put it this way: There's a reason why another team is likely gonna pay him more than we can afford.

If Starr was that great as a NT, why is he unsigned? Why did they only pick up the 5th year option and sign KK? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
    • Winning ain't gonna make my eyes lie to me. Context matters, and it will always matter in the game of football.
×
×
  • Create New...