Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jimmy Garoppolo Highest Paid Player in NFL History


h0llywood

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Putting that much money into your qb really puts you in a bind as far as getting other quality pieces. Brady has always taken less so that the Pats could put pieces around him. Don’t like the guy but he puts team before him

Brady is not even in the top 10.  Ironically, of the ten highest paid qbs last year, only two even made the playoffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Brady is not even in the top 10.  Ironically, of the ten highest paid qbs last year, only two even made the playoffs.

It’ll eventually happen, but to date no team has won a SB with a starting QB making $20,000,000 (or higher) per season.

Tom Brady realizes he’ll never spend all the money he’s earned in the NFL. He seems more concerned with his legacy than breaking the bank with a record contract deal. He knows QB’s are ultimately (rightly or wrongly) judged by world championships. He’s taken below market deals and it’s resulted in 8 SB appearances and 5 rings. I don’t think he’ll retire upset about his decision. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2018 at 1:52 PM, LinvilleGorge said:

At some point the QB bubble is going to have to burst. Of the final four teams in the playoffs, only one had what would be considered a traditional "franchise QB". One was playing what most consider to be a 1st round bust (Bortles), and two were playing career backups/borderline starters. At some point teams have to start thinking in terms of letting QBs walk unless they're truly elite. Let some other team pay the guy stupid money. Use that cap space to build a helluva D and put talent around the QB you're getting ready to draft to prop him up.

I do this in Madden all the time. Cam wanted some absurd contract as an 87 overall QB. You gone, son.

 

Much much harder to do this in real life though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, SCO96 said:

It’ll eventually happen, but to date no team has won a SB with a starting QB making $20,000,000 (or higher) per season.

Tom Brady realizes he’ll never spend all the money he’s earned in the NFL. He seems more concerned with his legacy than breaking the bank with a record contract deal. He knows QB’s are ultimately (rightly or wrongly) judged by world championships. He’s taken below market deals and it’s resulted in 8 SB appearances and 5 rings. I don’t think he’ll retire upset about his decision. 

The amount you can make in the NFL doesn't even compare to the amount you can make after you retire from endorsements if you've won multiple championships as a star.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It wouldn't be a bad idea. They could trade the #33 overall pick for Foles and still have #1, #4, #35, #60, and #65 in the first three rounds. Take say Saquon Barkley and Minkah Fitzpatrick at 1 and 4?

Yeah, I'd do that. I'd do that in a heartbeat. 

Thats a pretty good looking roster then. In a division that is trending in the wrong direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had 100 million to spend,..

btw, how the hell do teams do that? There’s like 10 teams with more than 70 million to spend?

his contract is almost like a weird version of Kapernicks contract, can easily cut him and not hurt them in later years.

obviously if they are right and the 49ers return to prominence because of the move then they were right.

We will see with the Seahawks starting over, Rams on their 2nd year- will they come back strong or has everyone figured them out? Then there’s Arizona that’s could find a good quarterback and be right back in the mix too. Going to be a tough division like the South.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...