Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Free Agency Notes and Speculation


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Riv said:

I think you're right that he could've benefited from a move to safety as his biggest strength was tackling and it would also hide his weaknesses.  I mean... it's not like we need a safety or anything.

I just wonder if he doesn't have it between the ears to play safety. A safety typically has to make a lot more checks and reads than a CB. CBs tend to be the better athletes, but safeties tend to need to be smarter football players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I just wonder if he doesn't have it between the ears to play safety. A safety typically has to make a lot more checks and reads than a CB. CBs tend to be the better athletes, but safeties tend to need to be smarter football players.

Won't disagree with what you said about playing safety, but I have no idea of the mental capacities of Worley.  However, his alma mater is not known for producing scholar athletes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stbugs said:

Seymour, ugh. The only people who mention Seymour are people who didn’t watch the games and just hated Worley because of DG. Worley needed to be replaced, but unless Elder is way better than expected we have to get a new starter at CB and S.

There's a reason why Worley was temporarily benched for Seymour. No Seymour wasn't great by any means, but he wasn't a huge dropoff from Worley simply because a huge dropoff from Worley is practically impossible on an NFL roster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

You really think Rudolph needs a WCO?

Mayock called him the best longballer in this year's draft. That makes me think Coryell.

I was not under the impression he had a cannon--no deep outs etc.  Maybe I am wrong, but he seemed like a QB with average are strength in college.  I need to do more homework before sticking to that---did not know Mayock said that.  Maybe this is where I get my supposition:

Bottom Line

Pocket quarterback with good size who has shown consistent improvement as a passer. Rudolph is more of a downfield, play-action passer than a quarterback who can win with precision and arm strength. He's a capable field reader who has the ability to operate with timing which will be important since his arm can be dull at times. Rudolph could be an early backup with the potential of becoming an average to below average starter in the league.  (NFL.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Riv said:

Won't disagree with what you said about playing safety, but I have no idea of the mental capacities of Worley.  However, his alma mater is not known for producing scholar athletes.

Yeah, I'm just speculating as to why we wouldn't have considered a move to safety. It just seemed pretty obvious to me that Worley's measurables and skill set seemed to fit better at safety than at CB so I have to think that there has to be some reason why we wouldn't have considered it given our need at safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, MHS831 said:

I was not under the impression he had a cannon--no deep outs etc.  Maybe I am wrong, but he seemed like a QB with average are strength in college.  I need to do more homework before sticking to that---did not know Mayock said that.

Yeah, I think he had two good deep ball WRs not that he was necessarily good at throwing the deep ball. Go and watch some James Washington highlights. He's catching a ton of those deep balls in heavy traffic and a lot of them require him to make some major route adjustments or slow down to wait for the ball. The slants in particular are on the money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...