Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

5 mil to Torrey Smith is no big deal. It's not.


top dawg

Recommended Posts

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Stop crying about losing Worley. The guy sucks. Addition by subtraction.

Subtraction means our #2 so far is Seymour, and God knows who we have behind him.

Like I said, we’re adding a scrub and making a bad position worse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

He’s equal to Samuel right now in terms of talent. Actually, Samuel is better at beating his corner at the line of scrimmage. They both are deep threats who have bad hands, except one is much cheaper and younger.

Samuel isn't a deep threat right now. Fast 40 time does not automatically equal deep threat. Samuel is much better off working underneath and getting YAC or at least he was last year. Smith and Samuel are very different wode receivers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Subtraction means our #2 so far is Seymour, and God knows who we have behind him.

Like I said, we’re adding a scrub and making a bad position worse. 

We will actually address our needs this offseason unlike recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

Subtraction means our #2 so far is Seymour, and God knows who we have behind him.

Like I said, we’re adding a scrub and making a bad position worse. 

So far. This DB roster isn't completed yet. Not by a long shot. Getting rid of Worley gives me hope that we're actually planning on addressing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

Samuel isn't a deep threat right now. Fast 40 time does not automatically equal deep threat. Samuel is much better off working underneath and getting YAC or at least he was last year. Smith and Samuel are very different wode receivers.

No. I have legitimate examples of him getting open 20+ yards down the field on multiple occasions and beating his guy on the line. That isn’t even a debate at this point. Samuel is and can be a deep threat.

The issue is whether his hands will catch it or not. That i agree with.

That is also the same issue with Smith. Eagles fans will tell you that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saca312 said:

yall cried when I said Russell Shepard had potential, but you gonna defend a 29 year old scrub with bad hands? 

The huddle is so weird

Smith's strong suit is the biggest thing our WR corps lacks - he's a true deep threat that can blow the top off of a defense.

Shepard is a career special teamer. You're embarrassing yourself in this thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

So far. This DB roster isn't completed yet. Not by a long shot. Getting rid of Worley gives me hope that we're actually planning on addressing it.

Even then, makes no sense to give someone who’s 29 and declining 5 million. 

Of course, addressing could be the same thing as Gettleman- through the draft. Gettleman addressed the position with 3 guys in 2016. What makes you think Marty will have any better luck?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Smith's strong suit is the biggest thing our WR corps lacks - he's a true deep threat that can blow the top off of a defense.

Shepard is a career special teamer. You're embarrassing yourself in this thread.

You’re embarrassig yourself by hyping up Smith lmao. Do I have to bring up the 8 times he dropped balls over a span of 8 games?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

No. I have legitimate examples of him getting open 20+ yards down the field on multiple occasions and beating his guy on the line. That isn’t even a debate at this point. Samuel is and can be a deep threat.

The issue is whether his hands will catch it or not. That i agree with.

That is also the same issue with Smith. Eagles fans will tell you that.

You can find examples of every WR getting open deep. A couple of gifs doesn't mean a receiver's biggest strength is getting open deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Saca312 said:

Even then, makes no sense to give someone who’s 29 and declining 5 million. 

Of course, addressing could be the same thing as Gettleman- through the draft. Gettleman addressed the position with 3 guys in 2016. What makes you think Marty will have any better luck?

We're paying Russell Shepard $3.5M to waste a roster spot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...