Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Batum Conundrum


Proudiddy

Recommended Posts

 
 
So, we have all been trashing Batum all season and have all been eagerly looking to move on from him.  But, the comments range from similar sentiments as I just expressed to this quote Batum gave actually being directed at Dwight.  Someone in the comments said that this quote, combined with other recent interviews Batum has done recently seem to be taking shots at Dwight...  i haven't been keeping up with interviews or anything really once we blew our chances at the playoffs and I only really checked box scores at that point.  But, I criticized Dwight early and often this season until many here convinced me he wasn't the problem because he was producing.  I argued that his numbers couldn't be trusted because everywhere he's been since Orlando, his presence just had a negative effect on the locker room and team chemistry.  His hometown teammates reportedly celebrated when we traded for him.  I thought that spoke volumes...   but, many convinced me he wasn't the problem the further the year went along, and I bought in.  Even when I watched parts of games, he didn't seem to be pouting or trying to show anyone up like he did earlier in the year, so I figured our failures were for other reasons.

Now, reading some of the speculation in those comments, I'm worried our problems run deeper than just Batum, Marvin, MKG, Frank, not playing Monk, etc.  I've stated repeatedly, when we traded for Dwight I was certain, on paper, we were a top 4 team in the East.  Kemba has another great year, Dwight produces, but everyone else sucks...  how could that be?

Look, this team isn't talent-laden, but it was good enough for the upper-tier of the East, if they could play together.  If Dwight wore on his teammates, it doesn't fully excuse Batum's shitty season, but it makes me truly wonder if, outside of Clifford, was Batum the real problem?  I'm now concerned we may have to do a complete tear down outside of Kemba.  Or if it was really Dwight, do we move him and keep Batum?  Do we still move Batum?  Either way, I think both guys trade value is next to nothing, so we'd likely have to take an L on anything we move them for.  Your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:
Look, this team isn't talent-laden, but it was good enough for the upper-tier of the East, if they could play together.  If Dwight wore on his teammates, it doesn't fully excuse Batum's shitty season, but it makes me truly wonder if, outside of Clifford, was Batum the real problem?  I'm now concerned we may have to do a complete tear down outside of Kemba.  Or if it was really Dwight, do we move him and keep Batum?  Do we still move Batum?  Either way, I think both guys trade value is next to nothing, so we'd likely have to take an L on anything we move them for.  Your thoughts?

Dwight definitely produced and that's tricky. His production was great, but the usage on offense was way too high. I think Dwight would have been much better suited to lead the second unit and give MCW a stat stuffing force to feed while letting Kemba, Nic, etc operate with a healthy Cody at center. Look, I like Dwight, I think he was a difference maker and I sincerely believe that he got along well with the staff and the team. Maybe it's bc he was playing a ton, but idk. I just think that in today's NBA and based on where he is physically in his career, it doesn't make sense for him to be the 2nd option or option 1B behind Kemba. But, by all means, make him the complete focus of the bench unit. 

Batum was trash this season. Definitely not living up to the contract. And look, I get it. He missed the preseason with the elbow thing, but if you're getting $120M you have to produce. Poor shot selection, turnovers, etc. Unacceptable. 

Unfortunately, the NBA contracts are fully guaranteed and you can't just cut someone like you can in the NFL and get CAP relief. Dwight is technically an expiring so someone may want him in a trade, but he's expensive. This roster might be stuck for one more season unless Mitch is willing to deal Kemba in a salary dump.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Maybe Batum needs to look at a mirror.. Especially when talking about problems with the team..

Being 6'8 with his supposedly vast skill sets.. You should be more than a role player.. 

Yeah, OP has for sure hated on Howard for far too long. Batum is fuging garbage. If Batum wasn't trash it would be a different story. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a funny feeling in a few weeks/months we will discover Nic has been pushing for a trade out of the organization to a contender. 

I think between us being awful this year, Cliff getting canned and the addition of Dwight (who I think Nic just can't stand). 

Now before one of you jumps all over me, I'm not saying Batum is blameless in this. He had an awful season. I think it's best for both parties if we trade him. The question is to who? Who has the cap space to take him on? 

Chicago maybe? But they aren't a contender. The Blazers? Definitely could be. Maybe the Kings? Again terrible team. Phx? Maybe they could be on the upswing especially if they get the number one pick this year. 

It's just going to be hard to trade him unless we include Kemba in the deal. 

But in the end that's probably what's best for our franchise moving forward. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SOJA said:

I have a funny feeling in a few weeks/months we will discover Nic has been pushing for a trade out of the organization to a contender. 

I think between us being awful this year, Cliff getting canned and the addition of Dwight (who I think Nic just can't stand). 

Now before one of you jumps all over me, I'm not saying Batum is blameless in this. He had an awful season. I think it's best for both parties if we trade him. The question is to who? Who has the cap space to take him on? 

Chicago maybe? But they aren't a contender. The Blazers? Definitely could be. Maybe the Kings? Again terrible team. Phx? Maybe they could be on the upswing especially if they get the number one pick this year. 

It's just going to be hard to trade him unless we include Kemba in the deal. 

But in the end that's probably what's best for our franchise moving forward. 

Chicago wouldn't really need him, I think they're trending up with a solid young squad.  

He could return to RIP City.  I'd be willing to not get much in return; maybe just take on a mildly bad contract (Leonard) and a future 2nd.  We just need to free the cap and get better with subtraction.  

ATL could be interesting...they've got Tyler Dorsey in the development stage but outside of Collins and Schroeder, that team is sh*t and needs role players.  They've got the cap this offseason.  I'd be willing to send Batum for sprinkles.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, davos said:

Chicago wouldn't really need him, I think they're trending up with a solid young squad.  

He could return to RIP City.  I'd be willing to not get much in return; maybe just take on a mildly bad contract (Leonard) and a future 2nd.  We just need to free the cap and get better with subtraction.  

ATL could be interesting...they've got Tyler Dorsey in the development stage but outside of Collins and Schroeder, that team is sh*t and needs role players.  They've got the cap this offseason.  I'd be willing to send Batum for sprinkles.

I agree if we can unload Batum without getting rid of Kemba I'd take a minimal return on him. His contract is just such an albatross. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bull123 said:

We could just suck it up and bring a $20m guy off the bench...that’s all he is, a good bench guy

That would kind of go against my grand plan of us tanking next year to get RJ Barrett 

A future of Monk + Bacon + Round 1 pick this year + Barrett + assets we could get for Kemba looks very promising 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, SOJA said:

That would kind of go against my grand plan of us tanking next year to get RJ Barrett 

A future of Monk + Bacon + Round 1 pick this year + Barrett + assets we could get for Kemba looks very promising 

Teams have done it but it wouldn't allow us to do much unless we unload Marvin or MKG.

As a set up to a blow up, I would be finding a way to unload Batum ($24mil, his contract was back-ended), Marvin ($13 mil, he's been solid, but funds should be reallocated with this youth), and MKG ($13 mil Experiment=over).

We have tradable assets in Lamb and Zeller with decent contracts (Lamb) and a "maybe" tradable with Frank.  We could latch any of those to one of the previous 3 for an ok package and get us at the least around $20 mil more in cap space.  Then that opens things up for a younger UFA signing with all-pro potential like a VanVleet or maybe get a mid-career proven like Favors or Tyreke Evans.  I also think Thaddeus Young could be a great part of a winning team.  Those are the names I hope we check out if we clear some room.  

The potential RFAs who are fringe max contracts are the REALLY intriguing ones for me.  Chris Paul (given his age, may not get max and could be a bridge), Aaron Gordon, Jabari Parker, Zach Lavine --at least one of those guys will not be with his current team come late Summer.  We would most likely need to ditch Howard or Kemba for the new contract.  This will basically come down to if Dwight still has value somewhere or if we're willing to part with Kemba.

TL;DR

In a nutshell, unless we really find some crazy good cap clearing deal for Dwight or get some great assets back for Kemba, we need to unload these role players with starter salaries and assemble a new crew around Kemba, Monk, Bacon, Willy...(& Dwight for one more season). The rest are expendable.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going to continue babbling:

The guy I've warmed up to this draft: Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.  PG Kentucky 6'7 185

The dynamic backcourt is the new NBA and if Monk and SGA both hit their stride, that could be a top duo in the league and fun as hell to watch.  I personally like his game more than Sexton or Young.  He's also got the size and is just one of the damn smoothest players you'll find.  Reminds me of one of my favorite players growing up in Penny Hardaway, who also happened to be his coach for a bit at Memphis-East.  I just don't see Trae Young or Collin Sexton in Charlotte.  

Mikal Bridges is the popular name (who I've been a fan of) but I totally see a team well built getting him as an important bowtie like Cleveland or Philly.  He's a compliment to a star, not the star.  Miles B. and Knox are others with size and athleticism, also because we're in dire need of a 3 who can score, but I'd rather draft for the pure star upside and the overall upgrade.  We don't really have anything set up long term at any position right now.

Look for provens and upside without selling the barn.  This is like a stabilizing ground for either a soft reboot or pre-structural work for the demo.  Find certain components while you gut the rest.  

I'm looking at the upside this year...we need a star and they're found beyond the top-5 more and more recently.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Derrick Brown was one player I never called or even suggested was a bust . Dude was young and hadn't even hit his stride. It takes time to learn the position. The thing I appreciated about him is that he kept improving season after season. He got paid and keeps on going like the Energizer Bunny.
    • How many teams coddle their QB the way Bryce has been coddled? I have never seen any other team in the NFL EVER baby a QB the way that Bryce has been.  Bryce was named day 1 starter his first year. It was obvious he didnt deserve it. He wasnt ready as evidenced by the worst rookie year in NFL history.  So let's move to year 2. He's named starter again with no competition in TC and is benched 2 games later. We have the ghost of a backup in Dalton who is so bad he can only beat Vegas and let's remember, the only reason he lost his starting job was a car accident, not because Bryce actually beat him out in practice.  And year 3. We sign Dalton again, who already proved he couldn't be depended on to put an even remotely passable performance on the field, and bring back Jack Plummer, who was even worse than last year. It was obvious he was nothing more than a pretend body in an attempt to create an illusion of some type of attempt to find a backup.  Then we start again with garbage play again and Bryce gets benched with a phantom injury, and the ghost of the ghost of Dalton breaks his thumb on the first drive and craps the field all over again. If we had actually made an attempt to find a legitimate QB2, it's possible Bryce doesn't step on the field again. Bryce is not agood QB and if we had any other mediocre QB, our record would be the same or better.  Bryce is not entrenched. He's been placed, protected and sheltered from ever having to face a  real QB competition in TC. Richardson and Levis both were ass and both were benched and eventually replaced.  Do I expect Baker to face competition in camp? Sure. I expect Tampa to find the best QB2 they can at price that fits their cap and resources and system and get him up to speed. If he's better than Baker, and if he's better by a significant margin, that's best for the team. The ultimate goal is a Super Bowl. Bellichek was constantly getting QB2s with the GOAT as his starter. He knew the value and that was realized when Cassell led them to an 11-5 record as a backup.  You and I may think differently than the people that matter but I will say it again. If you're afraid to bring in a capable backup, especially after the debacle of last year. The starting role wasn't earned, it was given, and that's loser mentality.
    • I would have done the same thing.  LSU is a much better job than Ole Miss.  Plus the enormous contract and every advantage a college team can offer in terms of recruiting and facilities and tradition etc 
×
×
  • Create New...