Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The Run and Shoot


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Some folks on here might be too young to know what that term means. 

For those who do, I'm finding that a lot of our current receiver lineup (Moore, Samuel, Smith, Byrd) would have fit pretty well into a run and shoot attack like the Lions, Oilers and Falcons used to run.

Run and shoot was almost like backyard football, less rigid than a lot of offensive systems.  It was different for the QB too, less strict progression and more "find the open guy".

Norv Turner is definitely familiar with this kind of offense, but he's never run it.  I don't expect he would here either, but pondering our personnel we have with the way those old offenses used to run, I kind of wonder if some of those concepts could work with who we have. 

And if you remember, Turner did say in his "summer" feature that offense didn't need to be complicated.  Norv's quote, "just find the open guy and throw it to him" is run and shoot in a nutshell.

To others who remember the old run and shoot offenses - or who get the concepts, anyway - what would you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, bababoey said:

Now if we only had Warren Moon to run it.

I actually think Cam Newton would love the improvisational nature of such an attack.

And heck, he's tall enough to have good downfield vision and find the open guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would Norv make that big of a switch?  Or are we trying to recreate the important elements of his offense?  I thought Norv was coming to adjust the offense, not make a wholesale change of things.  Better teaching, play calling, and execution were the goals, I thought.

Camp is going to be very interesting, that's for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

I actually think Cam Newton would love the improvisational nature of such an attack.

And heck, he's tall enough to have good downfield vision and find the open guys.

Right...Cam always plays best when we go uptempo and no huddle and play aggressive. We drafted him number 1, he's been mvp, we should play the style and tempo that suits him best in my opinion 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, d-dave said:

Would Norv make that big of a switch?  Or are we trying to recreate the important elements of his offense?  I thought Norv was coming to adjust the offense, not make a wholesale change of things.  Better teaching, play calling, and execution were the goals, I thought.

Camp is going to be very interesting, that's for sure.

Hard to say.  Not his base attack, but with that said Norv has (occasionally) shown willingness to be flexible.  Plus he knows he's never worked with a quarterback quite like Newton.

I wanna say he could work in some concepts here, at least as part of a "hurry up" kind of attack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, poorboysrev said:

Right...Cam always plays best when we go uptempo and no huddle and play aggressive. We drafted him number 1, he's been mvp, we should play the style and tempo that suits him best in my opinion 

That's kinda what they did with read-option, but I'm not a fan.

With the receivers we have, run and shoot could potentially be the better choice.

And heck, all of us watching would sure be having a blast :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...