Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Navarro asks Peyton Manning to be part owner of Panthers


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, pnthrs said:

I did, it wasn't that long and complicated.  I said it seems like a conflict of interest, and I wonder if it was.  I am conflicted and I don't know.  An owner of a team has a bias toward their asset and I wonder if a broadcast booth would allow an owner to maintain a consistent broadcasting career given that they would have to broadcast their own team.    Its hypothetical I know.  I have watched enough announcing to know that there is not much impartial broadcasting going on out there.  

I gotcha now. I was thinking of it in legal terms which to me there's no question that it would not be a conflict. But yeah that would be something the network would have to consider if they wanted to hire him and he wanted to announce as a minority owner. Either way I don't see him announcing at all, and particularly not if he was a minority owner somewhere--which would likely come with a front office role.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I wonder if this will hurt Navarro's bid or not. I would think the Panthers would want to steer clear on anyone with sex scandal accusations. This report came out last October.

 

That’s how  I feel but I don’t count 

he is far from the golden one that the NFL painted him to be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I wonder if this will hurt Navarro's bid or not. I would think the Panthers would want to steer clear on anyone with sex scandal accusations. This report came out last October.

 

Remember the very justified talk during the Hardy injustice of how it’d only be a matter of time before bogus allegations were used against innocent men and teams for the on field and financial advantage of others?  Allegations are just that-allegations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Nails said:

Remember the very justified talk during the Hardy injustice of how it’d only be a matter of time before bogus allegations were used against innocent men and teams for the on field and financial advantage of others?  Allegations are just that-allegations.

True. But if you use that logic then apply it to Richardson as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Nails said:

The messages from the old fool JR himself hung him, not Ray Rice elevator video.

 Don't get me wrong I am in no way excusing Richardson for his ridiculous behavior and Peyton was 19 at the time not fully grown. Still interesting that supposedly a payout occurred with Manning as well to settle the case similar to what Richardson did as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

And you may well be right.

It's long been rumored that Peyton wants to run a team. And it's no stretch to imagine that part of Navarro's pitch could be "And hey if you sign on, I'll put you in charge of the whole damn show!"

So while we're pondering how we feel about Manning the owner, you might also want to consider how you feel about Manning the GM.

I was doing laundry :)

Believe it or not, I do have a life outside of this board :thinking:

I hadn't thought about the GM angle

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely taken a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...