Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About the new stadium...


MHS831

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, bull123 said:

lots of Panther fans in SC & rightfully so...football is king down there with SC & Clemson...bet there are more Panther fans in Greenville or Columbia than there are in Raleigh

Maybe, maybe not..but they're also closer to Charlotte than Raleigh is, and Raleigh has a pro hockey team that seems to do really well up there.

It's a big mistake to take a stadium out of uptown charlotte.  The infrastructure with the light rail and surrounding restaurants are fantstic.  It makes for a great game day experience.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what happens to every taxpayer in every city that has a pro team of any kind... the owner says he/she needs money and if they don’t get it they threaten to go somewhere else.

 

One thing that better be on his “ to-do” list is getting rid of that fugging Shield 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HooverWalls45 said:

The infrastructure with the light rail and surrounding restaurants are fantstic.  It makes for a great game day experience.

you cant get much better infrastructure than next to a major interstate, only a couple miles from interchanges with a loop and another major interstate. as for the light rail, from what I understand, they are already planning a southern extension of the Blue Line which will run within a couple miles of the proposed state-line site. It wouldn't be difficult to install a loop to the stadium for easy access to the line.

you have a point about restaurants, but both them and  hotels necessary for a potential Super Bowl bid would most certainly spring up in the real estate surrounding a pro football stadium and a major theme park.

Trust me, I understand the desire to keep the stadium in uptown. I'm nostalgic over the Vault. It will be bittersweet whenever a new stadium IS built. I just think it makes too much sense to put a new stadium down on the border to not entertain the thought.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

This is what happens to every taxpayer in every city that has a pro team of any kind... the owner says he/she needs money and if they don’t get it they threaten to go somewhere else.

 

One thing that better be on his “ to-do” list is getting rid of that fugging Shield 

New Orleans, the city, obviously has more issues far more pressing than Charlotte, and those guys continue to play in a stadium built in the early 70s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, UpstatePanther said:

you cant get much better infrastructure than next to a major interstate, only a couple miles from interchanges with a loop and another major interstate. as for the light rail, from what I understand, they are already planning a southern extension of the Blue Line which will run within a couple miles of the proposed state-line site. It wouldn't be difficult to install a loop to the stadium for easy access to the line.

you have a point about restaurants, but both them and  hotels necessary for a potential Super Bowl bid would most certainly spring up in the real estate surrounding a pro football stadium and a major theme park.

Trust me, I understand the desire to keep the stadium in uptown. I'm nostalgic over the Vault. It will be bittersweet whenever a new stadium IS built. I just think it makes too much sense to put a new stadium down on the border to not entertain the thought.

Think about the surrounding area of the Vault in 1995.  Closest restaurant and bar was over by the (nonexistent) epicenter other than a couple strange ones.  Blue line didn't exist.  485 was just starting (help me here)? Point is that the SC/NC border will be threatened because it is viable from a cost perspective and will have the most expandable area for revenue generation.  Once the announcement is made it would probably be 3 years before construction is complete allowing for development and within a decade will be a vibrant area with easy transportation to and from uptown.  

 

I am all in favor of keeping the stadium in place but if it needs a tear dow in 10-15 years I don't know what we will realistically do.  We can't go back to Clemson for a few years lol.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, pnthrs said:

Think about the surrounding area of the Vault in 1995.  Closest restaurant and bar was over by the (nonexistent) epicenter other than a couple strange ones.  Blue line didn't exist.  485 was just starting (help me here)? Point is that the SC/NC border will be threatened because it is viable from a cost perspective and will have the most expandable area for revenue generation.  Once the announcement is made it would probably be 3 years before construction is complete allowing for development and within a decade will be a vibrant area with easy transportation to and from uptown.  

 

I am all in favor of keeping the stadium in place but if it needs a tear dow in 10-15 years I don't know what we will realistically do.  We can't go back to Clemson for a few years lol.  

You had 77 85 and 277. They could do like the bears did with Soldiers field. 

 

Really need to get the light rail built to the airport.  Have they even talked about one up to Mooresville area? That would help too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jens said:

I have problem seeing a new stadium as a threat to move the team. What other market is available that is big enough to support an NFL team ?

Smart man.  There aren’t any that 

a)have 15+million people in two football crazed states 

b)are perfectly located within a two hour or less flight of 60% of the US population 

c)will help publicly fund a $1.5 billion stadium

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2018 at 8:13 AM, bull123 said:

Agreed on the PSL issue...tepper gonna have to deal with that impediment when he comes calling for cash

not buying your comments on population largely made of other team’s fans...we are way past that

Sure.. I can see the "we are way past the population being mainly other team's fans" ...... I do not necessarily agree, and think it is more prevalent here; BUT not something we could prove either way and yeah, am sure it's across the league.  I am just sometimes surprised by the amount of some of the teams that come through.  Sometimes, I'm like "gonna be nice not to have so many today at the game..... " then get to the stadium and am surrounded by them :crying:... ie the Bills 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is definitely the down side of all this--on paper, I would offer up a second rounder for him if he passed my interviews.  He has already gone through (seriously?) a treatment program for gambling addiction.  I just see him as a first round talent that we could get with a second rounder.  If I liked Bryce and felt good about paying him $50m per, I would not touch Sorsby.  If Bryce regresses or stays the same--he is going to expect to be paid.  Sorsby, in my view, has a better long-term future as an NFL QB.  He is big, mobile, has good arm strength, and makes wise decisions (on the field) with the football.  He is a great dual threat, RPO QB.   I think he is a perfect solution for the backup qb position and insurance for Bryce should he get injured or suck.  Pickett?  King?  yikes. 
    • Hard to say--they are very unpredictable--this article came out last night---after our comments:  (ESPN)   How has the NFL approached NCAA players with gambling violations in the past? David Purdum, sports betting reporter: Quarterback Hunter Dekkers and wide receiver Kayshon Boutte were found to have committed gambling violations while playing college football, and both were allowed to pursue NFL careers. Dekkers was the projected starting quarterback at Iowa State but was ruled ineligible ahead of the 2023 season after an investigation found he had bet on at least one game involving the Cyclones (among other wagers that violated NCAA bylaws). The bet was just $15 on Iowa State to beat Oklahoma State in a 2021 game in which he did not play, but it led to the end of his Division I career. He played one season at Iowa Western Community College in 2024 before signing with the Saints as an undrafted free agent, and he spent last season on the practice squad. Boutte was arrested in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in January 2024 on charges of underage betting while at LSU. The arrest came roughly eight months after he had been drafted in Round 6 by the Patriots, and the charges were ultimately dropped. According to police, Boutte placed more than 8,900 wagers from April 2022 to May 2023, including betting on at least 17 college football games -- at least six of which involved LSU during that span. The NFL did not discipline Boutte.
    • He did himself more harm than good by engaging in this ridiculous legal battle. One it brought to light how much gambling he was actually doing and two it made him a very unlikable figure from a public perspective because he was challenging the perceived sanctity (lol) of college sports. Then to make things worse his lawyers convinced a very stupid and very gullible old boomer judge to agree with him. Now he’s a lightning rod entering the league and that’s not a good place to be. 
×
×
  • Create New...