Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Deadpool 2


Darth Biscuit

Recommended Posts

Can't believe there isn't already a thread...

 

Saw it today, and as much as I loved the 1st one, I thought this one...  kind of sucked.

 

Tbh they tried too hard. It just didn't have the same vibe as the first movie.

It wasn't super awful but...  several times during I wished it'd be done.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've heard the entire spectrum of things about it.

I've heard it's even funnier than the first.

I've heard it's about as good as the first.

I've heard it's good, but not quite as good as the first.

And I've heard that it's just kinda ok.

I'm seeing it Tuesday so I guess I'll find out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loved it honestly.  Would need to watch again, but may have liked it better than the first...though they no doubt we're trying too hard.  Still works for a movie like Deadpool for me though, where trying too hard can sometimes help the joke within the joke. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, London Loves Luke said:

Spoilers?

Yukio and Negasonic gave Deadpool Cable's time machine after fixing it in the first credit scene and were all, "Yeah, that may have been a mistake".

The next one saw Deadpool "fix' the timeline. He saves Vanessa from being killed by hitting the guy with the butterknife, saves Peter from dying by telling him to go home after he lands his parachute, GOES TO ANOTHER X-MEN MOVIE and kills that horrible looking Deadpool every fan in the world hated, and then shows up behind Ryan Reynolds and kills him the day he reads the Green Lantern script, lol.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Still Brooklyn said:

Yukio and Negasonic gave Deadpool Cable's time machine after fixing it in the first credit scene and were all, "Yeah, that may have been a mistake".

The next one saw Deadpool "fix' the timeline. He saves Vanessa from being killed by hitting the guy with the butterknife, saves Peter from dying by telling him to go home after he lands his parachute, GOES TO ANOTHER X-MEN MOVIE and kills that horrible looking Deadpool every fan in the world hated, and then shows up behind Ryan Reynolds and kills him the day he reads the Green Lantern script, lol.

Lol. I can’t tell if you’re joking but it’s deadpool so I expect the ludicrous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haven’t seen the movie, and I don’t care if you spoil it for me: I’ve been reading that somehow cables time travel thing (on his wrist) is similar to the same time travel thing on the Avengers wrists on set for Avengers 4...does Deadpool 2 leave it open for the Deadpool characters to appear in the MCU (once the Fox and Marvel deal go through) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Lobo said:

Haven’t seen the movie, and I don’t care if you spoil it for me: I’ve been reading that somehow cables time travel thing (on his wrist) is similar to the same time travel thing on the Avengers wrists on set for Avengers 4...does Deadpool 2 leave it open for the Deadpool characters to appear in the MCU (once the Fox and Marvel deal go through) 

 

There was a slight nod that it may. Apart from Deadpool literally calling Josh Brolin's Cable "Thanos" at one point. I think they're preparing us for it. Deadpool is entirely dependent on SHIELD, Cable, Spider-Man, the X-Men and various mainstream Avengers to exist further in good movies. This movie wrapped up his character arc (unless they want to introduce the comic book schizophrenia somehow). 

Seriously, put Deadpool in the next Avengers movie, even for a 10 minute scene. It'd go over like crazy and be a good way to announce that the deal is done and the inclusion of Fox properties has begun in the MCU. And the end credits scene actually fixes one of the major roadblocks to making it happen from a canonical standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
×
×
  • Create New...