We should seriously think about trading Funchess for a competent Guard.

[pantherclaw]

2 hours ago, MadHatter said:

This thread really makes me long for the good old days...when logical and intelligent posts were started.

It's been so long since I've seen one of those are you sure it's anything more than just Legend?

[LinvilleGorge]

3 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Another year of decent production and Funch gets 10+ million I think. If Sammy Watkins who is mostly a name can get 16 mil off of two productive seasons, 10 might be low for Funch on the open market when teams are always willing to blow money. Funch last year was only a notch or two below Sammy's best year (3 years ago) and without the injury history. I don't like the numbers we'll have to spend, but we're going to have to pay to keep him. 

This. He probably would've had 1000 yards last year if he'd stayed healthy. Another 800+ this year and he rakes in $10-12M per year. That's just what adequate starting WRs make in today's NFL.

[Swaggasaurus]

No need to trade. There’s some good vet guards in FA that we could plug in, probably even a top 10 guy at the position...I’ve heard he has gone Incognito though.

[panthers55]

Guards are much easier to replace than wide receivers especially one that is still cheap on his rookie contract. Nah this was a stupid suggestion and surely isn't going to happen. We are surely not as bad off as we would need to be to trade our best wide receiver for a guard. That is a pretty bad idea.