Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Reverse sear


Jackofalltrades

Recommended Posts

Got a 1.5 lb bone in ribeye waiting on me for the morning and I keep hearing about how good steak is prepared with a reverse sear. I have yet to try it but would like to, has anyone tried it and do you have any tips?

I’ll be cooking it in a cast iron skillet in a combo of real butter and probably a tablespoon on bacon grease. I just use Redmond’s Real Salt and a black pepper grinder for seasoning generally. 

TIA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well assuming you know the basics on how to do it, I would use oil (non-animal) to sear the steak and add butter/bacon fat later maybe a few min before done & baste both sides.

Butter will burn and mixing it with another animal fat like bacon they have about the same smoke point will also burn and could add some unwanted nasty flavors to your meat, because when you throw that steak into the skillet from the oven that skillet needs to be RAGING hot.

I use Avocado oil, & baste with grass fed butter mixed with a little minced garlic and rosemary just prior to taking the steak out of the skillet. 

 

 

 

P.S. Don't forget to fire up a nice Maduro after the meal :shades:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice

I'm partial to searing on the grill anyway, unless you have a high BTU stove top it’s questionable if you can get a cast iron pan as hot as it “should” be.

I’m doing a couple of Picanha cut steaks tonight for me and the wife tonight, I see your eggs in the back-round, now I’m thinking maybe serving with a sunny side egg on top.:thinking:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's all I use professionally and at home, I inherited some nice 1940's Griswold cast iron pans from my grandmother they are slick as snot, as good as a modern Teflon pan.

The new Lodge pans you can buy commercially take time to season and break in to get that slickness, i have a few of those as well after about 10yr heavy use they are getting to that level too.

Check out garage sales and second hand stores people don't know what they have they see a old maybe rusty pan and get rid it of not knowing its a classic that with a little cleaning up will last another 50yrs+ 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, PurityControl said:

It's all I use professionally and at home, I inherited some nice 1940's Griswold cast iron pans from my grandmother they are slick as snot, as good as a modern Teflon pan.

The new Lodge pans you can buy commercially take time to season and break in to get that slickness, i have a few of those as well after about 10yr heavy use they are getting to that level too.

Check out garage sales and second hand stores people don't know what they have they see a old maybe rusty pan and get rid it of not knowing its a classic that with a little cleaning up will last another 50yrs+ 

 

 

 

 

Why wife hit a Lodge outlet in Pigeon Forge a couple months ago and brought home 3 of them, seasoning is the task at hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackofalltrades said:

Why wife hit a Lodge outlet in Pigeon Forge a couple months ago and brought home 3 of them, seasoning is the task at hand. 

I like to season my cast iron outside on the charcoal grill get a raging fire, rub the entire pan with oil or even Lard put it upside down on the grate and let it bake all day/night until its cool to the touch. You can usually get higher temps on the grill then oven & without any of the potential smoke & mess.

 I found this to be a good method to restoring old neglected rusty cast iron. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PurityControl said:

I like to season my cast iron outside on the charcoal grill get a raging fire, rub the entire pan with oil or even Lard put it upside down on the grate and let it bake all day/night until its cool to the touch. You can usually get higher temps on the grill then oven & without any of the potential smoke & mess.

 I found this to be a good method to restoring old neglected rusty cast iron. 

 

Ooooh, consider it done!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@cookinbrak, with a reverse sear, you sear the meat at the end of the cook rather than at the beginning. You can either bake it low and slow or cook it in a sous vide cooker. They've also done plenty of tests that prove that searing beforehand doesn't actually seal in more juices, as post cook weights aren't significantly different. Searing is meant to create the crust on the outside of the steak due to the Mailliard reaction. 

I usually prepare any lean cut like filet mignon using a reverse sear. I either bake it for an hour at 250-275 or sous vide cook it for 1-2 hours, rest under tight foil for 10 mins then sear in cast iron for 2 mins on each side. They always turn out perfect. I prefer the baking method over sous vide. Sous vide is much better for chicken and super long cooks than for cooking steaks for dinner in my opinion. 

I bought a tub of clarified butter or ghee for use as my cooking fat for high heat because its smoke point is 485 degrees. I have used the same container for months and you don't have to refrigerate it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just stumbled on this thread, but I have been opting for reverse sear on thick cut ribeyes lately.

The trick I've found is to make sure the steak is at room temperature before starting the process. By doing this you don't really have to let it sit after cooking.

The other night I did the following method-

1. Cook over indirect heat on the grill about 30 minutes (or until the meat is about 15 degrees under your preferrred cook temp)

2. Right before removing from grill, canola oil in le creuset cast iron skillet blazing hot

3. Lay the steak in and drop a couple tbsp of finishing butter - such as this:

T6-FC-Black-Truffle.png?zoom=1.5&resize=

4. 1 minute on both sides then pull out

5. enjoy

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mjligon said:

Just stumbled on this thread, but I have been opting for reverse sear on thick cut ribeyes lately.

The trick I've found is to make sure the steak is at room temperature before starting the process. By doing this you don't really have to let it sit after cooking.

The other night I did the following method-

1. Cook over indirect heat on the grill about 30 minutes (or until the meat is about 15 degrees under your preferrred cook temp)

2. Right before removing from grill, canola oil in le creuset cast iron skillet blazing hot

3. Lay the steak in and drop a couple tbsp of finishing butter - such as this:

T6-FC-Black-Truffle.png?zoom=1.5&resize=

4. 1 minute on both sides then pull out

5. enjoy

 

Agree with the room temp comment. That's something I forgot to mention. It has made a noticeable difference in my results. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Drafting a WR in the 1st only guarantees one of T-Mac, Coker, or the new draft pick has zero chance of still being on the roster 4 years from now because they can’t all be paid at the same time. Which is why a WR in the 1st makes no sense, if we do that, I’d be pissed if we don’t also trade Coker this offseason, and I have zero interest in trading him, so……… We know T-Mac is that dude, so unless the team has serious concerns about Coker taking the next step, WR makes so sense to me in the 1st
    • We read each other and we bring together influences from a variety of sources--that is what makes this time of year great.  However, when you realize that the Panthers have talked to three (3) WRs expected to be there around #19, it must give us pause. We all knew about Cooper (who has been heavily mocked to the Jets at #16) and Concepcion (deemed to be the perfect Z WR based on his skill set).  Then the other day, the Panthers quietly brought in another tall WR that seems to be less than a good fit at first glance. First, a glance at the top 2 WRs the Panthers have shown interest in: Cooper (projected to Jets at 16--could possibly go as early as 9) Concepcion (considered to be a perfect fit for the Z WR (leaving Coker in the slot and TMac at X) has one major issue that has plagued the Panthers (see Legette, Xavier, TMac) in the area of drops.  Coker, on the other hand has never dropped anything in his entire life--including "in" or "by."  He can't even eavesdrop.   So, does that stat about Concepcion bother them?  It does me.  XL dropped 14% of his catchable balls as a rookie.  Last year, he found new ways to screw up, such as not knowing the boundares or lateralling to Rico for a big loss.  Yes, TMac was ROY and was terrific, but he had 8 drops, catching just under 60% of targets. Top NFL WRs are in the 70%-80% range--which is good news--it means that TMac can improve.  He caught 70 passes and dropped 8, meaning that his drop rate was about 10%.  If you are counting, Denzel Boston is another first-round WR whose stock may have dropped a bit because he did not run a 40 during his pro day.  However, I see him as the #3 or #4 WR in this draft.     Most people feel that Denzel Boston is in the TMac mold--a tall X.  Many of the same criticisms (about separation and speed) face Boston now. Although he is primarily viewed as a physical X (split end) receiver due to his 6'4", 212-pound frame, Boston has a weakness that makes him less valuable as the X but more valuable as a Z. Boston's ability to get off a jam at the LOS has been questioned--something an X does nearly every play. While his size and contested-catch ability make him a prototypical X, scouts and analysts note he has the versatility to move across the formation, including taking snaps in the Z or as a big slot, often helping to create mismatches. This would make him interchangeable with Coker.  Even if Legette does not come around, the Panthers would have a three-headed hydra at WR.  For much of last season, the Panthers had TMac, a goofy XL, and Versatility: Beyond being an X receiver, he is considered capable of playing Z or in the slot, allowing for movement across the formation. Physicality: With his size and strength, he can play on the outside, making him a strong red-zone target. Role Projection: While he primarily played on the boundary, his profile fits as a versatile receiver who can align in multiple spots to exploit matchups.  His 6-foot-4 height and 209-pound weight are ideal for an outside receiver who can play both X and Z positions at the next level.   NFL Combine write-up:  Two-year starter with elite ball skills that should supersede athletic/speed limitations. A Puka Nacua comparison might feel strong, but like Nacua, Boston enters the draft with speed/separation concerns and outstanding competitive toughness. Boston gets off the line with good burst and maintains his top speed throughout the route. He could have issues beating press, but releases can also be schemed. He’s very skilled when it comes to winning jump balls and contested throws. Boston also knows how to win in the red zone. Acclimating to NFL competition could take a year, but Boston has the makeup to become a productive possession target with above-average red-zone value.   The Panthers have looked at three Z WRs who will be first-rounders in all likelihood.  They have a proven track record of bringing in first-round picks.  The tea leaves are strong in this case.   here is Greg Cosell talking to the Bills analysts.  What he says about Boston (compares to TMac) is interesting (4:45).  https://www.buffalobills.com/video/greg-cosell-breaks-down-wr-draft-class-buffalo-bills Screen Shot:  No share available. "I don't think you have to just line him up inside (slot).  I think you can play him outside (X)."  That comment suggests he can play X, slot, or Z.  He then compares KC Concepcion vs. Boston--very different WRs.  In my view, Boston is more versatile.  Boston has excellent hands and he wins contested balls.  Red Zone--giving TMac someone on the other side of the field with the sure-handed Coker inside.  What Cosell says later (about Hurst, actually, but it applies to Concepcion): "You can teach guys to catch a ball."   He talks about Concepcion, Boston, and Cooper in succession.  I get the feeling he is less impressed with Cooper than others are because he questions the competition--based on the Indiana system vs. zone etc.  I would also say that any WR who has a good WR on the other side of the field probably gets less defensive attention. I should add that this also reflects poorly on XL, but I have said he would be a late bloomer.  I had no idea how much he did not know about football.  We shall see, but can you imaging how potent we'd be in 4 WR sets if he comes around?  How do you cover that?  (OT people are biting their lips right now) THE DRAFT It sure looks as though the Panthers are looking seriously at WR (the Z spot specifically) in the draft.  Can you see any other position that has garnered this much attention for potential day 1 players?  I cannot.   I am concerned about the OT situation, don't get me wrong, but Morgan is going to think, "I have a starter and I brought in a swing T (Forsythe).  Moton is a real concern.  We may look at RT later--and I know how others feel about it.  We could re-sign BC and he would be available after a month or two....I dunno. Less than 2 weeks to go--just thought I would take a look at WR because it seems, based on available "evidence," that a WR will be our pick....again.  
×
×
  • Create New...