Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

4 Simple question for Jake defenders.

koolkatluke

By koolkatluke,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

natty Newbie

natty

Posted
Posted

I want Jake benched as much as the next guy. I also realize that's not going to happen unless the season is completely lost, which probably won't happen until Dec. I think he's done but I'm also hoping that he can somehow rebound from all this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
Posted

Copying from the other thread.

1. He never was, and no one expected him to be.

2. Same answer.

3. Irrelevant since Delhomme doesn't fit the profile.

4. I'm for it. But from Coach Fox's perspective, it doesn't fit the need to win now and bolster his job security.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DelhommesTheMan Newbie

DelhommesTheMan

Posted
Posted

One question for Jake bashers...When is Peyton Manning available? Because thats the only guy that will make you all happy...We all know Jake isn't good anymore, but he's the best we got so deal with it...Sometimes you gotta support the team through the good and the bad..A new QB will be here soon, lets just get through with what we got..If it was so easy to find a QB than 5 teams every year wouldnt go drafting/picking up one..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

1. Is he a elite QB?

2. Is he a game manager QB?

3. What is the most Improtant thing in being a Game manager QB?

4. Why not start Matt Moore?

1. No, and he never has been

2. Yes, even though the offensive sets kind of look for a gunslinger at times.

3. Running the offense, taking what the coaches give you and executing it

4. Because he wouldn't be as good as Jake has been.

That's all you got? Jake is sucking but he's still the best option we have. As long as Davidson calls these retarded long passing plays he'll continue to suck, and you'll continue to waste electrons posting stupid threads like this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Copying from the other thread.

Mr. S a few years ago I would have said he was a above avg. Game manager.

With the right piece around him he could make plays and somtimes win games with his passing.

My point now is as a game manager your most important job is too not turn over the ball. Well we all know that has change for Jake.

So if he has never been elite and is not getting the job done as a game manager? Why is he still starting.

This single decsion will cost Fox and maybe Hurney their jobs. If you have too defend your QB every Mon. pressor their is a problem with your QB. It already seem like he is losing other players because his loyaty too Jake is becoming a cancer on this team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
koolkatluke Newbie

koolkatluke

Posted
  • Author
Posted

1. No, and he never has been

2. Yes, even though the offensive sets kind of look for a gunslinger at times.

3. Running the offense, taking what the coaches give you and executing it

4. Because he wouldn't be as good as Jake has been.

That's all you got? Jake is sucking but he's still the best option we have. As long as Davidson calls these retarded long passing plays he'll continue to suck, and you'll continue to waste electrons posting stupid threads like this.

You forgot you can't turn over the ball as a game manager. That should be the 1st thing you wrote for #3.

If your (game manager QB) is turning the ball over 2-3 times a game. He is not your best chance too win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cyberjag Newbie

Cyberjag

Posted
Posted

You forgot you can't turn over the ball as a game manager. That should be the 1st thing you wrote for #3.

If your (game manager QB) is turning the ball over 2-3 times a game. He is not your best chance too win.

Ok then, if you're a franchise QB you can turn the ball over, but a game manager cannot? They do it ALL the time. Most QBs out there are game managers, only a very few (Brady, Manning, etc...) are not. Gunslingers that don't win games don't get playing time.

Which type of quarterback relies more on the running game to move the ball, a game manager or a franchise/gunslinger QB?

Which type of quarterback relies more on the defense to win a game, a game manager or a franchise/gunslinger?

Which type of quarterback is more likely to run the draw or short pass on third and long? Which kind either throws short or long, but not the intermediate routes?

If Jake isn't a game manager, who is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Aussie Tank
      I wake up this morning full of rage towards Ronald McDonald Rivera / Gettleman / Hurney

      By Aussie Tank · Posted

      I woke up this morning with a sore back and shoulder's 
    • tukafan21
      Tetairoa McMillan - Your 2025 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year - (Welp... Guess I Was Right)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • tukafan21
      Tetairoa McMillan - Your 2025 NFL Offensive Rookie of the Year - (Welp... Guess I Was Right)

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...