Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

D.J. Moore was electric, but

Rags

By Rags,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
Posted

He was shut out the second half.

This isn't a bad thing, he was electric for us the first half.

But the Ravens adjusted to him. As will other teams now that tape is out. This is why we've been using him sparingly.

Torrey Smith, a veteran isn't flashy like more but he's been geling more as our offense has. He's our Cotch. This core needs him just as much as we need Moore.

This is mainly for @RumHam who can't tell the difference between a rock and a vet. But I know if Moore starts cooling off we'll lose our heads and start blaming everyone. Moore flashed today. That's what rookies do. 

Terrific team win. Moore's gonna be special. I cannot stop cumming.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, panik said:

True, but is also true that he will just get better with time.

Oh no doubt, but he still has s learning curve.

This fanbsse is extremely feast or famine. If he slows down we'll just hear more bitching and moaning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted

What about Smith's first four games when he had 6 catches on 17 targets for 67 yards as a starting WR?

I honestly think part of Smith's resurgence the previous two weeks was because teams had pretty much written him off. They were basically treating us as having 10 men on the field on offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheRed Newbie

TheRed

Posted
Posted

Why are you so eager to add a "but" to his performance? What the hell is with this fanbase? We've been clamoring for a legit WR of Moore's mold for how long now? Come on.

We ran away from the Ravens because of the different options we had offensively. Moore is a piece of a larger puzzle now. That's what we drafted him for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Riv Newbie

Riv

Posted
Posted
 

He was shut out the second half.

This isn't a bad thing, he was electric for us the first half.

But the Ravens adjusted to him. As will other teams now that tape is out. This is why we've been using him sparingly.

Torrey Smith, a veteran isn't flashy like more but he's been geling more as our offense has. He's our Cotch. This core needs him just as much as we need Moore.

This is mainly for @RumHam who can't tell the difference between a rock and a vet. But I know if Moore starts cooling off we'll lose our heads and start blaming everyone. Moore flashed today. That's what rookies do. 

Terrific team win. Moore's gonna be special. I cannot stop cumming.

 

Meh.  It's no coincidence that we had our best game without Torrey in the lineup.

Wright is our Cotch.  Moore and Samuel need Smith's reps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LegioX Mentor

LegioX

Posted
Posted
 

I think the Ravens just adjusted well and we then took advantage in other areas. Definitely not concerned about his game at all today.

Yes. Norv went to Cam on several occasions where Baltimore were hell bent on stopping CMC. Was a good change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Riv said:

Meh.  It's no coincidence that we had our best game without Torrey in the lineup.

Wright is our Cotch.  Moore and Samuel need Smith's reps.

Yep. With Smith out and Funchess deemphasized this offense took off. We need to feed CMC, Moore, Samuel and Olsen while Funchess and Wright need to be primarily possession type chain movers. That's when we're going to be most dangerous. Smith came up very clutch in the previous two games, but it was largely because the opposing D had no respect for him and was focusing on everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Rags Mentor

Rags

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, TheRed said:

Why are you so eager to add a "but" to his performance? What the hell is with this fanbase? We've been clamoring for a legit WR of Moore's mold for how long now? Come on.

We ran away from the Ravens because of the different options we had offensively. Moore is a piece of a larger puzzle now. That's what we drafted him for.

Because the next game our offense struggles this board is gonna poo it's diaper per usual.

I've been one of the more vocal "shut up, stay calm, we're good" posters on here so miss me with lumping me in with these other whiners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • t96
      D-Mo on FA & some of my general thoughts

      By t96 · Posted

      My general take on the state of the team not going too in depth is this: Either Morgan or Canales (hard to say whether it’s the players or the system/coaching, and that goes for any team) has been responsible for considerable strides forward on D and a bit more productive offense, but it’s been a small sample size and we collapsed at the end of the year. I lean towards it being more Canales growing as a coach and building a culture of buy-in and getting the most out of players in the locker room. My reasoning for leaning there is that Morgan was part of the Fitterer stink and it’ll take him a while of sustained success in roster management to overcome that in my mind. Next year is a big year to see if that was a fluke or not. These big signings this offseason are exciting and sometimes teams can have amazing FA classes but more often than not those who spend big and “win the offseason” don’t show the results in the regular season.    As far as QB goes, in a vacuum I’m completely fine with the Pickett signing, he’s ok value for a backup and a huge improvement over Dalton. If Bryce went down there isn’t a huge drop off there and if the rest of the team builds on last year they could win games with him under center. I’m not sure the ‘85 Bears could win games with current Dalton under center. But the O is just so damn limited with Bryce and Pickett does not push him at all, he’s purely a backup. So I agree we I’d love to see a QB with some upside drafted, a guy who could actually push Bryce if/when he struggles or doesn’t improve any further. He’s improved steadily the last 2 years but it has been from arguably worst in league history to still below average. I’m not convinced he can get any better than purely average at absolute best. I hope he can man but I just don’t see it happening. And the longer we keep penciling him as starter the less confidence I have in this staff. Even with our unexpected relative success as a team last year sometimes you do have to take another step back to take a step forward, and that could mean moving on from Bryce, and temporarily going with a slightly worse player like Pickett while aggressively trying to upgrade the position and taking dart throws in the draft/free agency on upside players. I know, there wasn’t much available this offseason outside of Willis, and this draft class seems to be poor at QB. But I’d have preferred we try something and if it didn’t work and we took a step back then just keep trying until something hits. Rolling with Bryce is just delaying the inevitable and living in purgatory.    just my 2 cents, hope I’m proved wrong
    • MrBubba
      BREAKING: Panthers have interest in Deebo Samuel

      By MrBubba · Posted

    • h0llywood
      BREAKING: Panthers have interest in Deebo Samuel

      By h0llywood · Posted

      His market value is 15.7 million. Not worth it to bring him at his age, at that price. If we were to bring in a veteran, DeAndre Hopkins is available for 2 million market value. I've said this in other threads, get Keenan Allen to play the slot. He's as good as a pass catching tight end and is market is under 7 million.
×
×
  • Create New...