Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Isn't it ironic how we were all worried about defense...


top dawg

Recommended Posts

...And it has been mainly the offense, or a major part thereof, that has left us weeping and gnashing our teeth? Our total defense ranks 6 in the league at this point. We are number 6 in week 6. Our passing defense ranks FIRST. Now, of course our run defense ranks 25, but we have stiffened up now that our starters are on the field (and the new addition of Thomas). With all of this, and the addition of Tank, we have great reason for optimism. Now, we are a train wreck on offense which hit us out of left field. We rank 29. We are 31 in passing, 28 in receiving and 16 in rushing. Here we were all taking the offense for granted, and you know that 99.9 percent of us were (even in spite of our last playoff disaster), and it is the offense, or parts thereof, that has us pulling our hair out.

Shakespeare couldn't have put it together any better. Fox is the puppetmaster, Jake is the tragic hero, and Peppers and the boys are the only thing worth smiling about at this point. If it wasn't so serious (from a totally football perspective), it would be damned funny. Irony has seized the day and turned the world of Panthers fans upside down and inside out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You must not have read enough threads here in the offseason. There were a million different people warning about how Delhomme had lost it and we needed to upgrade and how the crop of receivers continued to be a joke.

Yeah I read some of the threads, and maybe even started a couple. The thing is SMF, I believe that people saw a Jake fall-off as a gradual decline. I don't think that anyone thought that his skills would fall off the damned cliff. Those of us (pre-contract) who were arguing against Jake were doing so in the midst of the Jake lovers, and the Jake-is-our-best-option (if not only option) crowd, and doing so more of looking at the long term future as opposed to this season.

At least, that's how I was looking at it. Moreover, I don't remember any sane minded people referring to our crop of receivers as a "joke", but that we desperately needed a viable threat opposite Smith because Moose was getting old and maybe not cut the mustard. Some believed, and possibly still believe, that Jarrett could be that guy, but of course most of us were still skeptical, but not waving our arms and running around in circles over the issue.

Now, it appears that Murphy's law has prevailed, but there is still a sliver of hope that the ship can be righted. I have been very skeptical of Fox for the last four years, and Jake even longer, but I'd be lying if I said that our prolific B+ offense would drop down to D because of the ineffectiveness of Jake, lack of a viable receiving threat other than Smitty, and to a lesser extent the play calling of Fox and the OC. And I think that most would be lying if they said they saw such a prolific drop in our offensive production so quickly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

actually you have to use stats per game.. since some teams still havent had their bye weeks..

here are the real stats..

defense:

yds /game: 306 (12th)

pass yds /game: 156.8 (2nd)

rush yds /game: 149.2 (29th)

pts /game: 25 (27th)

offense:

yds /game: 290 (26th)

pass yds /game: 158.8 (29th)

rush yds /game: 131.2 (8th)

pts /game: 17 (24th)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think everyone expected growing pains. I still dont think we are at the level the D can be but with Peppers playing at a high level and the D getting help at DT we have played better. I still say that our DBs have not got Cover 2 down yet. None of them have looked all that good at coverage. Really our LBs have not ether.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fwiw, I don't think our receivers are a joke. In fact, including backs, tightends, and backup receivers, we are probably in the best shape we have been since 2003. At least our receivers aren't dropping many balls they should catch.

The main problem on offense right now is lack of protection for the Qback, and the high numbers of interceptions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure why everyone keeps talking about the Panthers paying him $50M/year. I don't recall anyone EVER saying he deserves that. I think something like what the Dolphins signed Malik Willis to would be good: 3 years, $67.5M but it will probably be something along the lines of Mayfield or Darnold which is around $35M/year.
    • Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
×
×
  • Create New...