Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper won't speak


Cookie Lyon

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, Camp Fodder said:

I am pretty sure that Gettleman always had a presser at the end of the season and I think JR had one too.  It’s not a lot to ask that the powers to be would at least hold a presser to tell the fans what’s going on and how we are going to move forward after this epic collapse that we just sat thru the last 2 months

The pressers happen around the 13 or 14th of the month looking at history.  Being the 1st you are about two weeks shy of that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GeorgeHanson said:

I'm interested to read your sources for where Jerry Richardson was on record for what he "wanted"?  As for his son, he and Jerry are estranged so suggesting Mark's friendship with Navarro is somehow an implicit endorsement by Jerry is a gigantic stretch.

Any on the record sources for all these assertions?

Albert Breer had a lot of info on the team sale from behind the scenes.  The reports of Richardson's attitude and dissatisfaction with the process came from Darin Gantt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Moo Daeng said:

The pressers happen around the 13 or 14th of the month looking at history.  You are about two weeks shy of that.

Simmer down

 

That because we was usually in the playoffs.   He will talk holiday today so expect something to happen tomorrow and pressers to follow.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I've seen several people make the argument that since he's mega rich, he must know what he's doing.

Dan Snyder, Jerry Jones and Jim Haslam are all mega rich too.

For that matter, so was Jerry Richardson.

It's not simply the fact David Tepper is wealthy. It's how he made his money that makes me think the guy is pretty smart.

That said, he's still a rookie owner and much like how someone cautioned Washington might have some rookie struggles, keeping Ron and Marty looks like a rookie mistake on Tepper's part. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/31/2018 at 2:28 PM, Panthers2019 said:

yup nothing Rivera could do once Cam reinjured his shoulder our season was over when that happened and no other coach would had done any better in that spot.

How about not forcing an injured QB to play and instead playing your backup QB? What the fug was Ron's plan? To squeak into the playoffs where we would have no chance if Cam can't throw more than 20 yards? Hope it spontaneously heals itself? Oh that's right, he had no fuging clue and no fuging plan. Ron forcing- or allowing- your star franchise QB to play through a damn shoulder injury just proves he has no clue what he's doing.

And the way Allen looked yesterday-albeit against Saints players who knew they didnt have to win- you have a better shot at winning with the backups than with Cam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/1/2019 at 10:44 AM, Mr. Scot said:

I've seen several people make the argument that since he's mega rich, he must know what he's doing.

Dan Snyder, Jerry Jones and Jim Haslam are all mega rich too.

For that matter, so was Jerry Richardson.

By most folks standards all 4 guys you mention are in fact mega-rich.  That said, none are even close to being in the same league with Tepper.

Jones made some decent coin prior to buying the Cowboys but the vast majority of his net-worth ($5-6bn) is tied up in the team (worth ~$5bn), he's team-rich and cash poor on a relative basis.  Jerry got kinda lucky when he paid only $140 million for the Cowboys.

Snyder is reported to be worth $2.2 and to his credit (same as Jones), he made it on his own.  That said, not a ton of cash laying around and at best his net-worth is 20% of what Tepper's is.

Haslam inherited his coin ($3.7bn) and apparently isn't overly bright, totally outclassed by Tepper in every respect. Haslam only worth 1/3rd of what Tepper is.  No credit given here.

Richardson has the least money of all of them, probably not even $1bn after the tax man is done with him.  However, he too gets credit for making it on his own (vs. say Haslam).

For perspective, Tepper's personal net-worth is just about the same as all 4 of the others you mention -- COMBINED.  100% of his funds are self-made and the vast majority of the coin is very liquid, the man has a TON of cash. 

This thing is a marathon and we aren't even to the 1-mile market yet, patience people!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Further perspective, Tepper could write a $3bn check for the LA Dodgers and another $3.6bn check for the NY Knicks and still have almost $2.7bn in cash left over.  That's a ton of dough and Tepper had this thing locked up (Panthers purchase) before the first Observer article that ever mentioned his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, GeorgeHanson said:

Further perspective, Tepper could write a $3bn check for the LA Dodgers and another $3.6bn check for the NY Knicks and still have almost $2.7bn in cash left over.  That's a ton of dough and Tepper had this thing locked up (Panthers purchase) before the first Observer article that ever mentioned his name.

I get that Tepper is richer. He could be the richest man alive. I wouldn't care.

Let's say I have the world's best computer programmer. He's a guy who knows every language imaginable. He'd have to be incredibly smart to master all those things, for certain.

So I put him in charge of running an auto body repair shop.

He has no actual experience running an auto body repair shop, but hey he's smart so he'll figure it out, right?

Does he have any leadership skills? Management skills? Is he good with people? His being a master programmer doesn't really answer any of those questions, does it?

So will he succeed? Maybe he will. Maybe he won't.

Being smart, even mega-smart, at one thing doesn't necessarily mean you're going to be good at everything. There are different skill sets involved. It's the same as assuming that a guy who's a good coordinator will also be an excellent head coach or GM. Again, not a given.

We're not guaranteed that Tepper will be a good owner. We hope he will, but it's not guaranteed.

Yes, he has experience as a Steelers minority owner.

So did Jim Haslam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get that Tepper is richer. He could be the richest man alive. I wouldn't care.

Let's say I have the world's best computer programmer. He's a guy who knows every language imaginable. He'd have to be incredibly smart to master all those things, for certain.

So I put him in charge of running an auto body repair shop.

He has no actual experience running an auto body repair shop, but hey he's smart so he'll figure it out, right?

Maybe he will. Maybe he won't.

Being smart, even mega-smart, at one thing doesn't necessarily mean you're going to be good at everything. There are different skill sets involved. It's the same as assuming that a guy who's a good coordinator will also be an excellent head coach or GM. Again, not a given.

We're not guaranteed that Tepper will be a good owner. We hope he will, but it's not guaranteed.

Yes, he has experience as a Steelers minority owner.

So did Jim Haslam.

Minority owners are just along for the ride, they control nothing.  Just as neither Johnny Harris nor Smokey Bissell ever had anything to do with day-to-day operations of the Panthers, Tepper and Haslam had zero to do with the operations of the Steelers -- passive investors, nothing more.

Out of curiosity, what do you consider David Tepper's core-competency to be?  In your eyes what is he an expert at?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thielen was a "dawg" like Dan Morgan likes to say. And they replaced him with puppies.  The analytics are probably saying this is more targets for younger receivers they are hoping to develop, specifically the first round pick from 2025. The eye test is going to show a very inexperienced group of WRs that are going to have some serious growing pains, for a 3rd year QB who has not yet proven to be the guy going forward.  It's crazy how in the literal first game of his NFL career, Cam Newton showed everyone he was a star QB and there was never any doubt about that. It almost didn't even matter who was around him, although he definitely had a serious lack of talent at WR for most of his career. Bryce is going into his third season and there is still a ton of doubt, and who is around him is seen as crucial for him to have success. I don't like it. 
    • Everyone says AT was old and slow but the one thing he could do consistently was get separation. That takes skill and it's been a huge issue in our WR for years. And while Moore may be a great locker room guy and our WR coach may be a 12 year vet, he's not playing in the game. Vets like AT do what they do because they can see things others don't and exploit it. The DB interview I mentioned before was with Stephon Gilmore after his DPOY season. He was pulling the younger DBs aside showing them things you wouldn't even think you'd be able to tell from the way the receiver was standing.  Seeing what a DB or LB is biting on in game that can give you that half step advantage is huge and we don't have that experience in our WR group right now and I think it could end up hurting us. None of our receivers have lined up against NFL corners successfully on a regular basis. Having someone that can walk over and give you a tip to get a half yard separation can be a difference maker. 
    • We only fielded about 4 NFL calibre players on that unit last year. 
×
×
  • Create New...