Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Montez Sweat 6'6 245 DE/OLB


Trill OG

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, bobcat91 said:

There are zero reputable mocks that dont have him in the first.

 

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

If he comes into the combine at 250+ he's going to be borderline top 15.  He comes in at 240 he'll fall but still stay a first rounder

Not saying either of you are wrong, but most mocks have him all over the place.  I've seen as high as 7, and yes, some outside of the 1st round. SB Nation at 22, Bleacher Report at 24, Sporting News not in the 1st, CBS - one mock at 23, one at 25, one mock outside the first, Walter Football at 25. 

He's a guy I like and should be in the first, but for every guy who starts projected in the 20s and rises in the draft, the same number fall.  Hell, Kony Ealy was a projected 1st rounder in some mocks right around draft time years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CarolinaNCSU said:

Things will obviously change and they're meaningless, but seen a mock draft or two with Sweat in the 2nd round.  Doubt he's an option at 16 unless he kills the combine. 

He will absolutely be an option. He plays DE and he's one of the top prospects that will be on the board when we pick at 16. Not sure why you think he is not an option with our weakness at the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since we are doing a youth movement could we start changing into a 3-4 defense?? (I know there are tons of posts about this and it’s a process) Poe could be great as a NT with Short as a DE. If we draft Sweat we can use him and Haynes on the outside (probably Addison too) giving us Shaq (or TD if we sign him for cheap) and Luke in the middle. Still leaves us one DE short, but we can try Butler at it or sign a FA... I feel like we are constantly missing prospects because they don’t fit the 4-3 scheme...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...