Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Report: Panthers Considering switch to 3-4


TheCasillas

Does a 3-4 defense excite you?  

133 members have voted

  1. 1. Does a 3-4 defense excite you?

    • Yes
      78
    • No
      54


Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, Growl said:

I'm talking about a higher form of discussion than you've given

You're actually trying to debate which "system" is better. 

No system is ever better. The talent on the field is the real measure of success, and any maneuver that makes acquisition and retention of talent easier/less competitive, is something worth pursuing.

You're the one who posted the Wade Phillip's article not me..

You're the on who 1st talked about how easy it is to find players to play the 3/4 scheme..

Pretty much I just been proven your statements wrong..

I agree it's all about the personal and right now we don't "really" have the personal .. So how is that a financial benefit?? 

And your last sentence is wrong because no matter which scheme you play you still have to acquire the right players and pay them.. There are bad defenses in both schemes.. Its hard to find a Von Miller,  Kalih Mack  just as it's hard to find a DeMarcus Lawrence, Cam Jordan and you still pay for those type of talents..

So while you're looking for that "higher form"of conversation you might want to check the mirror and see if you're really providing that??

Wow what a prick...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

You're the one who posted the Wade Phillip's article not me..

You're the on who 1st talked about how easy it is to find players to play the 3/4 scheme..

Pretty much I just been proven your statements wrong..

I agree it's all about the personal and right now we don't "really" have the personal .. So how is that a financial benefit?? 

And your last sentence is wrong because no matter which scheme you play you still have to acquire the right players and pay them.. 

you still don't even understand what the discussion is about, how can you be "just been proven my statements wrong."

this is the simple law of supply and demand at the NFL level we're (I'm) discussing. Less bidders equates to better value buys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Growl said:

you still don't even understand what the discussion is about, how can you be "just been proven my statements wrong."

this is the simple law of supply and demand at the NFL level were (me) discussing. Less bidders equates to more better value buys.

Dude 13 teams are running a 3/4 base and that doesn't include the Pat's  and Seattle who run a hybrid of both.. Not to mention some teams draft tweeners and smaller DE types and play 43 wide 9 because oline play sucks and the pass is taking more importantance than the run..

So reality check the talent pool is still the same no matter what defense you run..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Growl said:

quite frankly it appears the NFC south has figured out Ron Rivera's defense and change for the sake of change might be a great idea, but that's hardly my point

It isn't just this offseason. 

Imagine being able to get guys like tj watt at 30th overall instead of sitting helplessly as the equivocable 43 prospect goes #2 overall every draft/having to trade away multiple 1st rounders to move up and take January Jumpers from UTEP in the top half of the 1st round

Von Miller went #2 overall. Chandler Jones is the highest paid non-franchise tagged DE in the league and he went #21. Demarcus Lawrence will be the new highest paid 4-3 DE as soon as he signs and he went in the 2nd round at #34.

This idea that elite 3-4 pass rushers grow on trees and elite 4-3 pass rushers can only be found in the top five of the draft simply isn't rooted in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

Can’t believe Ron would be switching to a 3-4 during a season in which his job is on the line. 

Can see him switching up but not going straight 3-4

Well to be fair, opposing offenses pretty much had his 4-3 scheme figured out, especially our division rivals.

Will this make a difference? I don't really know. If I'm being honest, I think it kind of reeks of desperation.

But we'll see...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Von Miller went #2 overall. Chandler Jones is the highest paid non-franchise tagged DE in the league and he went #21. Demarcus Lawrence will be the new highest paid 4-3 DE as soon as he signs and he went in the 2nd round at #34.

This idea that elite 3-4 pass rushers grow on trees and elite 4-3 pass rushers can only be found in the top five of the draft simply isn't roeality.

you're cherry picking, and I'll defer back to wade Phillips commentary as counter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Growl said:

you're cherry picking, and I'll defer back to wade Phillips commentary as counter

And you didn't cherry pick with TJ Watt?

I respect the hell out of Wade Phillips as a defensive coach, but he's never been a GM and modern contracts pretty clearly illustrate that his opinion on the matter may no longer be relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Sub Zero said:

Dude 13 teams are running a 3/4 base and that doesn't include the Pat's  and Seattle who run a hybrid of both.. Not to mention some teams draft tweeners and smaller DE types and play 43 wide 9 because oline play sucks and the pass is taking more importantance than the run..

So reality check the talent pool is still the same no matter what defense you run..

the hilarious irony of you even saying this aside, it's an incredibly superficial overview, neglecting scheme variation, within the 34, individual positional importance, team preferences in comparison to the simple truth that 43 teams don't pass on blue chip DEs regardless of situation, and etc etc.

You can't just subtract, though don't think I didn't notice you try to downplay the numerical discrepancy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Well to be fair, opposing offenses pretty much had his 4-3 scheme figured out, especially our division rivals.

Will this make a difference? I don't really know. If I'm being honest, I think it kind of reeks of desperation.

But we'll see...

 

Yep. The Saints and Falcons have been having a field day against Ron's defense ever since we went to the Super Bowl. And before anyone mentions it, beating a Saints team in Week 17 that treated the game like a glorified preseason game means nothing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Growl said:

the hilarious irony of you even saying this aside, it's an incredibly superficial overview, neglecting scheme variation, within the 34, individual positional importance, team preferences in comparison to the simple truth that 43 teams don't pass on blue chip DEs regardless of situation, and etc etc.

You can't just subtract, though don't think I didn't notice you try to downplay the numerical discrepancy.

You figure out the numerical discrepancy and let me know how big of a difference that is?? Smh 

At some point dude you're just arguing just to argue.. 

Lets just end it with a agree to disagree and move on..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Yep. The Saints and Falcons have been having a field day against Ron's defense ever since we went to the Super Bowl. And before anyone mentions it, beating a Saints team in Week 17 that treated the game like a glorified preseason game means nothing.

The 1st saints game was 12 to 9 thoe..

I agree somewhat but could it be the personal over figuring Rivera out.. 

Our Secondary has been trash for a few years now..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Sub Zero said:

The 1st saints game was 12 to 9 thoe..

I agree somewhat but could it be the personal over figuring Rivera out.. 

Our Secondary has been trash for a few years now..

Our secondary will likely always be subpar under Ron. Ron builds his defense around the front seven and relies heavily on a dominant pass rush. When we have one of the top pass rushes in the NFL, we'll have a very good defense. When we don't, well... we'll have what we had this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2019 at 12:54 PM, SetfreexX said:

The defense doesn't matter the personnel does...as well as the coordinator putting guys in position. 

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?tabSeq=2&season=2018&seasonType=REG&role=OPP&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=1&conference=ALL&d-447263-p=1&defensiveStatisticCategory=GAME_STATS&d-447263-s=TOTAL_POINTS_GAME_AVG

Best defenses in points allowed per game is a mix of 3-4 and 4-3 teams. The main thing trending is there are more tweener OLB / DE's coming out of college, same deal for the OLB/S hybrids. Finding traditional 4-3 defensive ends is harder based on the spread looks in college, defenses are electing for more speed and athleticism upfront. 

We DO NOT have any 3-4 pieces on our roster at the LB position specifically the pass rushing - Luke, Shaq , Carter, Smith etc are all 4-3 LBs. 

None of our current defensive ends would transition well either, Addison can't cover, Peppers if he returns is not at his best in coverage at this point, Haynes has the tools as a speed rusher off the edge, but can't hold the  point of attack based on his size. And if you're considering Obada or Horton it makes no sense. 

 It would require an overhaul to make it happen, You could maybe have the front three with Poe at the NT, and KK, and Butler at the DE positions. We'd have to play Shaq, and Luke inside at MLB, and we'd need two 3-4 OLB's. Haynes is a specialist at this point, and like I mentioned I can't see Addision or Peppers at this stage as 3-4 OLB's. 

If we're going to maximize the guys under contract we need to add pieces that fit the defense we run currently, trying to switch to a 3-4 would likely take at least two off-seasons, and I don't think the leash is longer than this year. 

I hardly get on this forum because so much is just knee jerk poo... But this was a great rundown. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...