Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Memphis willing to part with Gasol, Conley


bLACKpANTHER

Recommended Posts

 

Tempting.. we would probably have to take Parsons off their hands too if we want to make them happy..

http://www.espn.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=y7stnzbd
maybe Batum, Biz and Frank + 1st round pick?

I feel like another team could easily beat that package and we lose out.. not that we need Gasol or that he would be a perfect fit to pair with Kemba, but just thinking out loud.. Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, OldNorthPowell said:

I would like it depending on what is given up. No Miles.

Rumor was we offered Batum, Monk and a 1st.  No idea how accurate that is but getting rid of Batum would be huge. Seems like we would need to move one of our other centers though since we would then have four.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Batum + Monk = Drummond
yep.. im for anything that gets a proven Allstar caliber player to help Kemba..

PLUS - we need defense.. our offense has been really good this year.. Drummond is an elite rebounder and can put in 15-20 pts @ night if he wants to..

I'm not thrilled with throwing in a 1st rounder though.. maybe we can send some of the stockpile of 2nd rounders we have??

 

 

hey.. woulda been nice if we just drafted Drummond instead of Zeller, huh!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The right answer is neither and drafting Maye with the #1 Pick of the 2024 Draft lmfao we traded away the #1 in a QB LOADED DRAFT
    • I have no idea why you are so irrationally upset about the notion that going out and spending $150 million free agency dollars on two interior offensive linemen could be construed as a panic response after our #1 pick we traded a fortune for had one of the worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years. It is objectively what transpired. Dan Morgan as of right now is a mixed bag. Some really good some so so some not so good some bad some really bad. You take any rational criticism personally like you are related to him or something. That's something you'll have to figure out for yourself. Anyways. The predicament Dan Morgan finds himself in for this year will define his future as GM. I sincerely hope he navigates it to perfection. But the circumstances are largely of his own creation. And not just in his stint as GM but going back to his time as assistant GM. Which conveniently people like yourself don't like to talk about. That is the reality of the situation. I like how you will carry water for Dan Morgan to the point of getting into random spats with people but make no mention of Bryce Young's glaring limitations and shortcomings as a starting QB yet go out of your way to put the onus of our struggles squarely on Canales. I mean I've been quite critical of Canales too but he sure isn't the only one to blame for our problems.
    • They weren't well thought out. We needed one, not both. 2 top center/guard candidates were going to be available in the 2nd. We would have been fine with JPJ or Frazier. Drafting either over XL or Brooks would have made perfect sense. Hell, drafting both would have made sense even if we had signed Lewis or Hunt. Instead we drafted a 1 year wonder project WR and a luxury RB that we didn't need since we had Hubbard. Draft IOL, pay tackles. Plenty of 2nd round guards and centers start immediately and play very well. Those 2 picks were not good then, now, no matter how much explaining anyone tries to do. Several of called it then. 
×
×
  • Create New...