Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Are We Trading for Marc Gasol?


YoungPanthers89

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Shocker said:

Disagree as usual

Gasol is good

But is older

And 2, has a big contract.  So just even less space going forward in trying to resign Kemba, and any shot at resigning Lamb.

Plus mortgaging a 1st, when some are saying. This is going to be one of the better draft classes.

Thatd be too steep.

Taking Batum along with with to alleviate cap space would be worth the 1st

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ncfan said:

Gasol is good

But is older

And 2, has a big contract.  So just even less space going forward in trying to resign Kemba, and any shot at resigning Lamb.

Plus mortgaging a 1st, when some are saying. This is going to be one of the better draft classes.

Thatd be too steep.

Taking Batum along with with to alleviate cap space would be worth the 1st

THE ONLY WAY a smart owner and GM get rid of that first round pick in a trade for Gasol is if Batum is sent packing as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Gasol is good

But is older

And 2, has a big contract.  So just even less space going forward in trying to resign Kemba, and any shot at resigning Lamb.

Plus mortgaging a 1st, when some are saying. This is going to be one of the better draft classes.

Thatd be too steep.

Taking Batum along with with to alleviate cap space would be worth the 1st

I will say this...if we get Gasol for Biz, Frank and a few 2nd rounders that is a steal IMO.  Gasol is old, true, but still damn effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I will say this...if we get Gasol for Biz, Frank and a few 2nd rounders that is a steal IMO.  Gasol is old, true, but still damn effective.

Thatd be a good trade 

First would just be too much without them taking our bad contract.

Id say Biz, Bacon, Frank for 2 2nds.  May have to throw in Lamb.

 

But thatd be a win

Link to comment
Share on other sites

we need to make a move for an allstar-fringe-type player.. we need to show Kemba we are serious about winning.. if throwing in a 1st rounder gets us rid of Biz's contract and nets us Gasol - we do it..

stop bitching about the garbage rookie player with hidden potential that turns out to be a bench role player after we hang on for 4-5 years..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bLACKpANTHER said:

we need to make a move for an allstar-fringe-type player.. we need to show Kemba we are serious about winning.. if throwing in a 1st rounder gets us rid of Biz's contract and nets us Gasol - we do it..

stop bitching about the garbage rookie player with hidden potential that turns out to be a bench role player after we hang on for 4-5 years..

A 34 year old CENTER. Jordan  is not patient. Every year it is win now. Even with Gasol at best we are 5th in the east MAYBE 4th. A bounce in the first or second round at best. Rinse and repeat. I believe that is great for moral victories but not for being a serious contender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, OldNorthPowell said:

A 34 year old CENTER. Jordan  is not patient. Every year it is win now. Even with Gasol at best we are 5th in the east MAYBE 4th. A bounce in the first or second round at best. Rinse and repeat. I believe that is great for moral victories but not for being a serious contender.

you do realize there is a team out there made up of KD, Steph, Klay, Green and Boogie rite?

if we make it to the 2nd round and get bounced - that would be absolutely huge for us..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, bLACKpANTHER said:

you do realize there is a team out there made up of KD, Steph, Klay, Green and Boogie rite?

if we make it to the 2nd round and get bounced - that would be absolutely huge for us..

So, moral victories instead of building a legitimate contender? A rental on a few 4th or 5th finishes in the east for a few years, then a rebuild? Just postponing the inevitable. I guess I just expect too much of a professional organization. It is what it is though, none of us are controlling this crap show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldNorthPowell said:

So, moral victories instead of building a legitimate contender? A rental on a few 4th or 5th finishes in the east for a few years, then a rebuild? Just postponing the inevitable. I guess I just expect too much of a professional organization. It is what it is though, none of us are controlling this crap show.

Tanking is the definition of an unprofessional front office.  You have this all backwards.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah, Darnold is basically a really high level game manager. Put him on a good team where he isn't required to provide lift and he can shine. But when you need him to do the franchise QB thing and put the team in his back here comes the INTs. He just doesn't seem to have any positions on his dial between "super conservative take whatever's there and take care of the ball" and "YOLO!!! There's a receiver down there somewhere in that sea of defenders!"
    • See, it's posts like this that show me how many of you are taking my post as an anti Dowdle post and saying he didn't have a good game, but that's the furthest thing from my intention and what I'm trying to say. Because that's the comparison you're making with Bryce, it's adding or removing a small handful of plays from their stats and saying "this is the game they could have had instead" I'm literally only talking about the play calling from the game, it's literally in the title of the thread, that we still have play calling problems. I'm saying that people are going to get stuck on the 200 yard rushing game by a player and extrapolate that to "well Canales must have called a good game" and I'm trying to say not to fall for that mirage. Because 6 big runs do not make for a well called game when we had over 60 snaps. Even beyond that, if you add in the two 20+ yard catches from T-Mac and the one XL had, and you're looking at 9 of over 60 snaps that accounted for close to 60% of our yards in the game. That's a few big plays covering up for coaching deficiencies, that's NOT a well called 60 minutes of football. Had he had the 200 yards because Canales' play calling was keeping the defense on their heels, not knowing what we were doing next, and Dowdle was ripping of 8-12 yard runs on a consistent basis, then yea, that would be something to be excited about with Canales finally calling a good game for a change. Our offense is predictable and the play design is basic, there is nothing I've seen out of Canales' offense that says he's able to scheme and call plays to outsmart the defense, which is something all the elite offensive coaches are able to do in this day and age.
    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
×
×
  • Create New...