Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mcshay’s new mock.


micnificent28

Recommended Posts

42CAC3DF-9DA2-4F91-A8C3-F3BCD9981BF1.thumb.jpeg.8e188b85c6db4a978a6ab2f2c6c84a66.jpeg

Well if ur a Mcshay Guy(I am I love him and Kiper personally) then It looks as if defensive ends are sliding. We’re in luck because olinemen have moved up boards. He has Gary as the second defensive lineman off the board and you all know how I feel about him..

All you Ferrell hypers could be in luck. But I would much rather Have any of the others Sweat beyond Gary than a one year guy playing on a line of First rounders.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ferrell had 11.5 sacks this season and 27 in his college career. Hall had 3.5 his final college season and 14 in his entire college career.

Hall had the measurables, but there's a reason why he was available in the third. We took him as a project hoping we could develop him. He just wasn't a football player. He never was.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, micnificent28 said:

I said you Farrell fans might be in luck. If you like Overacheivers with less than great physical tools he’s a fine guy. I think he’s basically deshaun Hall playing alongside Garrett myself

Hall wasnt wrecking the top OTs in the draft

Austin Bryant is more like Hall

 

Ferrell has been lucky to play with that DL.  But you can say any player playing along with ______ helped him at any major program.

 

Ferrell matched up against the top OL in the draft in the national championship who some people have going as high as top 5.  And Ferrell wrecked him

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Ferrell had 11.5 sacks this season and 27 in his college career. Hall had 3.5 his final college season and 14 in his entire college career.

Hall had the measurables, but there's a reason why he was available in the third. We took him as a project hoping we could develop him. He just wasn't a football player. He never was.

 

I don’t put much stock into Statistics when judging a guy. Of course they are indicators when a player is an elite athletes and the numbers are there, but when your playing on a first round line and everyone else double teamed and your one on one u should win more matchup. Not saying he was never doubled but, he had plenty of chances to put up numbers.

If he runs a 4.6-4-7 I will cut him a break. I need to see some atleticism to put him ahead of sweat at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 4Corners said:

Why the F would you start a mock draft thread and omit the only team anyone on here cares about?

not making the huddle better 

Because it’s the off-season and everyone is talking prospects not who we don’t know will be there at 16. Mock drafts are a big guessing game but, they can show a general idea of the top prospects.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Hall wasnt wrecking the top OTs in the draft

Austin Bryant is more like Hall

 

Ferrell has been lucky to play with that DL.  But you can say playing along with ______ helped him at any major program.

 

Ferrell matched up against the top OL in the draft who some people have going as high as top 5.  And Ferrell wrecked him

 

He’s the hall of there defensive line, Lawrence and Wilkins were better football players than him. They garnered more attention and will probably go higher in the draft than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, micnificent28 said:

He’s the hall of there defensive line, Lawrence and Wilkins were better football players than him. They garnered more attention and will probably go higher in the draft than him.

Actually if youve watched Clemson games

Theyve always said Ferrell was the besg player on the Line.  Said the staff has stated it as well.  A lot of the interior gets help from his presence on the edge.

 

Austin Bryant is the Hall, freak athlete.  Doesnt put the big #s but when he does mainly due to the other guys.

 

Those interior DL didnt help him punking the top OL in the draft in the national championship game.

He was abusing Jonah Williams worst than Garrett abused Cam Robinson, and Williams is Much Much more highly touted than Robinson.  That interior had nothing to do with that.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

If he is the Hall are you saying that Bryant is better than him?

No sir. I don’t mean Ferrell is terrible and he is a first rounder. I mean he is the” other guy” and benefits from having elite talent around him. I only don’t care for him when compared to the other options at defensive end because, he probably isn’t a to end athlete which is a big thing when you talking first half of the first round. He’s decent though. You could definitely do worse.

if we talking hall vs Farrell straight up then Farrell easy.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nobody is giving up a 4th rounder for a backup QB And anyone who needs a starter badly enough to where Bryce would then be their starter, is such a bad team that they're not giving up a pick likely to be about pick 105ish overall, instead of just dealing with a bad QB situation for a season and then drafting one in a loaded QB draft next year. I'm looking through all the teams right now and can't think of a single one that would be willing to part with anything better than a 6th rounder. Barring injuries (and excluding the Panthers), there look to be 10 teams who don't know with 100% certainty who their starting QB will be in 2027... Dolphins, Jets, Browns, Steelers, Vikings, Colts, Saints, Falcons, Cardinals, and Rams. Of those 10...  The Rams know it will be Stafford or Simpson.  The Saints more than likely will be sticking with Shough unless he takes a huge step backwards.  So neither are giving up any draft picks for Bryce right now, just wouldn't make sense for either. Down to 8 Given their current QB situation of having multiple QBs they already need to evaluate between this year, the Browns (Shedeur/Watson), Vikings (Kyler/JJ), Colts (Jones/Richardson/Leonard), and Falcons (Penix/Tua), wouldn't be giving up a 4th (or maybe any pick) to bring in another QB to muddy the waters even more. Down to 4 Dolphins just signed Willis and wouldn't want to bring in another small Alabama QB who has struggled after just dumping Tua instead of just rolling with Ewers as the backup.   That then leaves the Steelers, Cardinals, and Jets left as it's clear none of them have any idea who their 2027 could be as of right now.  But the Steelers would for sure rather just see what one of the 2 QB's they drafted in the last 2 drafts could become than give up a mid round pick for Bryce.  Same goes for the Cardinals in taking Beck this past weekend. The Jets would be the most likely team to even consider taking him on, but I think it seems very apparent right now given them rolling with Geno and now talk of bringing in Wilson to be his backup, they're punting on QB this year to draft someone next year, so why give up even a mid round pick for Bryce?
    • Honestly I am not sure Pickett couldn’t step in for him. But I don’t see a clear easy upgrade and we are not KC with Alex Smith we are a team that hadn’t done poo for almost ten years and just made the playoffs. And looked good in the game. That stadium atmosphere on that day…. you know Tepper ate that poo up. Not one drink has been thrown in a while.  You had better make sure if you replaced him after that that you had a sure fire upgrade. 
    • Makes sense. If Bryce is ass this year, we are probably drafting our new QB next draft and sitting him behind Bryce for a year
×
×
  • Create New...