Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Be Careful What You Wish for......


AKPantherFan

Recommended Posts

AK sorry but.......... your statements in this thread are about as dumb as trying to decide whether or not to put the spare on when you have a flat.

BTW.....you do know you are defending Jake, right?

I know and yesterday I WANTED TO KILL JAKE.

I just think that this next Sunday should be his LAST CHANCE.

thats it. Nothing more. Just 1 shot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If not Jake, we should start Feeley the next two games. You don't want to throw Moore on the fire on the road in Arizona and then New Orleans. Let him get his start in Charlotte.

I appreciate the sentiment of Jake starting in Arizona, honestly. Those who are saying that real life isn't Hollywood are absolutely correct; there's no reason to believe we'll get a magic monkey off his back. But if Feeley isn't the answer, don't start Moore in that situation.

Oh, and if Jake does start, tell Davidson that if he calls one passing play over 10 yards downfield then he's on the first bus back to Cleveland.

Best way to beat Arizona is to run the clock, run the ball, and use short passing and don't turn the ball over. Who would have known that that gameplan coincides with what Jake Delhomme is incapable of contributing with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I've said before. What's good for McNabb is good for Delhomme. He got benched and may be playing better now for it. Jake needs a mental time out. Time to readjust.

It may not be the end of Jake but based on his last 7-8 games him starting another game is unjustified. Anybody else would pull their QB Favre or not after 13INTs and not even being half way through the season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree we need to let Matt Moore have a shot- I just dont think against the Cardinals.

You have to think Jake will get on track on Sunday.

That game will be more than personal for him. No matter what is said this week, that game is going to make or break Delhomme forever.

I believe he starts, wins, and gets his head out of his ass.

We can be that offense that scored 30+ points a game again. Its all the same personnel so it has to be mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Subtract 7, then add 14 to get how many Delhomme is responsible for. I forget if Goodson's fumble led to points in the Philly game. If so, subtract that amount.

So without doing the math, it would seem Delhomme has thrown more passes leading to scores for the other team than for his own.

But now we're facing the team that started Delhomme's downward spiral. It's the perfect storm! Delhomme's out for revenge, and he'll most certainly get it! It will make such a nice story for the Observer and the Herald! And the Huddle! Oh my, the Huddle!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AK, I appreciate what you do here. But you are flat out wrong on this. You are setting Moore up for failure if he comes in at half time and we are down by more than 2 TD's.

You keep saying Jake deserves one more shot, every game this season has been his one more shot.

Even if Jake does start and comes out and doesnt play completely retarded, where does that leave us next week. One more Jake Delhomme disaster away from benching him.

If there is ever a time to bench your starting QB, it is now. The team is still good, and Moore will be surrounded by talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...