Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Speculation: Cardinals might already be negotiating with Kyler Murray


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Kingsbury raved about Murray and said he'd pick him #1 overall in the draft if he had the opportunity. The Cardinals hired him. I don't think you hire a complete wildcard of an NFL head coaching candidate and then not give him the QB he wants.

I'll be shocked if the Cardinals don't take Murray.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I still think they are crazy wanting to draft him 1st overall. 

I mean, has anyone else seen him in the Orange Bowl with Alabama? I just watched those highlights and they were of Alabama taking him down repeatedly over and over again. 

He looks great with no pressure as many do— but Alabama gave him and us the best preview of what it’s going to look like in the NFL when teams really come after him.

it looked bad— and he’s half the size of RGKnee,.. 

whatever,... not my problem,.. just makes it a better chance a guy I like actually makes it to 16.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JARROD said:

I still think they are crazy wanting to draft him 1st overall. 

I mean, has anyone else seen him in the Orange Bowl with Alabama? I just watched those highlights and they were of Alabama taking him down repeatedly over and over again. 

He looks great with no pressure as many do— but Alabama gave him and us the best preview of what it’s going to look like in the NFL when teams really come after him.

it looked bad— and he’s half the size of RGKnee,.. 

whatever,... not my problem,.. just makes it a better chance a guy I like actually makes it to 16.

He racked up over 400 all-purpose yards against Alabama.

His size is definitely a red flag, but you don't hire a gimmicky college all offense coach and then not give him the QB he wants. You're not even giving your almost certainly bad hire an honest chance if you don't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Still don't understand why they haven't just come out and announced he's the pick.  It can't be fear of losing leverage or value in trading Rosen because everyone already thinks Murray is the pick.

The Panthers never announce anything that isn't official. Doubt other teams would either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The Panthers never announce anything that isn't official. Doubt other teams would either.

I misspoke.  I didn't mean like an official release or anything, but several teams with the #1 pick have openly telegraphed their plans with the pick in recent years...  some have even agreed to terms before the draft.  To me, it makes even less sense in this scenario because the Rosen situation lingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Proudiddy said:

Still don't understand why they haven't just come out and announced he's the pick.  It can't be fear of losing leverage or value in trading Rosen because everyone already thinks Murray is the pick.

What would be the point?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...