Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Rumors Thread

MHS831

By MHS831,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted

I did not see a trade rumor thread.  Watching NFL Network and I can start a few rumors.  Please add them as you hear them.

Green Bay getting offers at #12.

Atlanta (#14) looking to trade up for inside pass rusher (Oliver?).

Miami (#13) needs a lot--would consider a trade back.  Casserly feels they will build the roster in 2019 and go for a QB in 2020.

Washington (#15) may trade up for Haskins, which means they would probably have to leapfrog #6 Giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chosen Newton Explorer

Chosen Newton

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

I did not see a trade rumor thread.  Watching NFL Network and I can start a few rumors.  Please add them as you hear them.

Green Bay getting offers at #12.

Atlanta (#14) looking to trade up for inside pass rusher (Oliver?).

Miami (#13) needs a lot--would consider a trade back.

Washington (#15) may trade up for Haskins, which means they would probably have to leapfrog #6 Giants.

Giants interested in Daniel Jones. WAS might not need to jump over NYG after all 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted

I thought for a while that Raiders and Cards have a deal in place and that the NFL is asking them to keep it under wraps until tonight. The Raiders sent their scouts home to make sure it didn't leak.

It just makes too much sense. Raiders go up to 1 to get Murray. They need someone exciting like Murray to sell tickets in the new stadium in Vegas. Cards stick with Rosen and have their pick of Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, and Bosa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, trueblade said:

I thought for a while that Raiders and Cards have a deal in place and that the NFL is asking them to keep it under wraps until tonight. The Raiders sent their scouts home to make sure it didn't leak.

It just makes too much sense. Raiders go up to 1 to get Murray. They need someone exciting like Murray to sell tickets in the new stadium in Vegas. Cards stick with Rosen and have their pick of Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, and Bosa.

makes sense.  Wow--that would shake things up.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trueblade said:

I thought for a while that Raiders and Cards have a deal in place and that the NFL is asking them to keep it under wraps until tonight. The Raiders sent their scouts home to make sure it didn't leak.

It just makes too much sense. Raiders go up to 1 to get Murray. They need someone exciting like Murray to sell tickets in the new stadium in Vegas. Cards stick with Rosen and have their pick of Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, and Bosa.

Cards have spent a lot of time with Bosa.  Could happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, trueblade said:

I thought for a while that Raiders and Cards have a deal in place and that the NFL is asking them to keep it under wraps until tonight. The Raiders sent their scouts home to make sure it didn't leak.

It just makes too much sense. Raiders go up to 1 to get Murray. They need someone exciting like Murray to sell tickets in the new stadium in Vegas. Cards stick with Rosen and have their pick of Josh Allen, Quinnen Williams, and Bosa.

Honestly, nothing about it makes sense. Why would you hire a gimmicky sub-.500 all offense failed college head coach if you're not going to give him the QB he wants? The experiment is almost certainly destined for spectacular failure, but if you don't draft Kyler Murray you never even gave it a chance.

I think the Raiders do have a surprise in store tonight and Mayock has hinted to this, but I think that surprise is QB at #4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Someone on NFL network made a good point--the focus in the NFL has been on getting the ball out quickly---this makes DE/Edge less important and middle pass rushers more important.  Atlanta is considering trading down for Oliver, but if not,  I think they take Wilkins.

In other fragmented news, it looks as if 3 QBs are going in the first half of the first round--

1. Murray

4. Haskins (to Raiders or a trade up)

15. Jones (Redskins would take either Haskins or Jones here--could trade up for haskins---some talk about trading back as well--LT says Jones is no first round talent, Casserly likes him, compares him to Brad Johnson, Trent Green)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

Someone on NFL network made a good point--the focus in the NFL has been on getting the ball out quickly---this makes DE/Edge less important and middle pass rushers more important.  Atlanta is considering trading down for Oliver, but if not,  I think they take Wilkins.

In other fragmented news, it looks as if 3 QBs are going in the first half of the first round--

1. Murray

4. Haskins (to Raiders or a trade up)

15. Jones (Redskins would take either Haskins or Jones here--could trade up for him---some talk about trading back as well)

I still think Elway is taking Drew Lock.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TylerDurden Grand Master

TylerDurden

Posted
Posted

I'm not mad bc it will benefit us, but I just dont understand Washington.  It's like they just want to take a QB just to take one.  They still dont know if Alex Smith is coming back, picked up Keenum who can be really good in the right system (and I think he fits in really well in Gruden's offense), and they still want to draft a QB?  And not a specific one, ANY QB they can get lol...  sounds like a good plan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Proudiddy said:

I'm not mad bc it will benefit us, but I just dont understand Washington.  It's like they just want to take a QB just to take one.  They still dont know if Alex Smith is coming back, picked up Keenum who can be really good in the right system (and I think he fits in really well in Gruden's offense), and they still want to draft a QB?  And not a specific one, ANY QB they can get lol...  sounds like a good plan.

And the QB draft next year is so much better--why not wait a year to see what you have?  Gruden's job is not on the line....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      Actually that 4400 was based on a 16 game season to match Bryce's 16 games this year. Your offense has to be to drive the ball when it matters. Bryce doesn't do that with any level of consistency. If you're building a team that isn't focused on your QB, then fine. Then there's no need to pay Bryce as a franchise QB because literally anyone else will do. If you're going to pay him 50m plus per season, you have to be able to put the team on his shoulders and know he's going to carry the load. So far, when the pressure is on to get it done, Bryce has fallen miserably short of the target. 4-6 to finish out the season and 0-2 when all we need is a win to secure a playoff spot isn't stepping up and proving yourself as a franchise QB. I'd say it's quite the opposite.  There isn't a single coach in this league that would take Bryce over Burrow and very few if any that would take Bryce over Prescott. Hurts didn't have to throw in 2025 because Philly's defense was disgusting and Saquan had a MVP season. But then again, Hurts has shown that he can when it counts, and then there's his signature. Philly runs the tush push to lethal perfection, but that's a play we can't even consider with Bryce. You used 3 QBs from teams that had no defense to show QB stats don't always matter. When we had the worst defense in the NFL, we didn't see Bryce step up and carry the offense and put up gaudy numbers in a losing season because we were playing catch up. It was pretty much the opposite.  What have we seen from Bryce consistently to consider offering him a top 10 NFL franchise QB level contract? At the end of the day, that's all that matters.   
    • KillerKat
      Post-Draft: Gantt sets A stage, not THE stage. Perhaps Reset Your Expectations

      By KillerKat · Posted

      I mean, what fanbase has high expectations when you have a QB like Bryce leading your team?
    • LinvilleGorge
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      If you pay Bryce $50M a year you greatly limit your ability to put the type of team around him you need to have to have a chance to win. THAT is the problem. Hell, we can't win with him on a rookie contract. How the hell are we supposed to start winning with him paying him like a franchise QB and having to make tough roster decisions to accommodate his cap hit? 
×
×
  • Create New...