Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How'd that new 3-4 defense look today?


Raleigh PF

Recommended Posts

35 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

Blame the offense for getting gashed on every run? That was supposed to be one of the better front 4’s in the League and they looked like Tampa Bay.

Yep I'll blame Cam and DJ for giving the Rams the ball 3 times on a short field. 17 points 

And Slye missed a FG

Defense did ok

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy said:

Can be, but what did you expect from them when the offense fuged them all game?

Offense did put them in a few bad spots.  But 170+ rushing yards is NEVER acceptable for a defense.  That has nothing to do with the field position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, philit99 said:

I disagree, if you are constantly caught in a less than desired personal package and you have to call time out for substitutions, your getting out coached.

FFS, Cam and DJ turned the ball over 3 times and gave the Rams a short field. 17 points. That's not coaching, that's execution

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jimmy said:

FFS, Cam and DJ turned the ball over 3 times and gave the Rams a short field. 17 points. That's not coaching, that's execution

Yes that’s true, but the second time out and the 12 man call are being out coached. The turnovers changed momentum, but there were coaching calls made by the rams that exposed our relaxed substitutions. They would bring in an uncharacteristic personnel like 13 but use wide outs as tight ends. That forced us into the wrong defense then we couldn’t substitute because they would run hurry up with out substituting. That was great coaching. Hence, we got out coached.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Jimmy said:

Blocked punt, INT, 2 forced fumbles. Looked good to me

Outliers. Whenever the Rams ran they usually got why they wanted. 3rd and Longs casually being converted by a streaking TE in the middle.  Same old soft D. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't necessarily think he will be moved, I would currently be leaning against that notion. I think a lot will depend on the coaching situation. Carroll certainly can't be thinking about wanting to go through a serious strip down and overhaul, so the longer he plans to remain, the less likely I think Crosby gets moved.
    • I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
×
×
  • Create New...