Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

ESPN Sucks!


Catdaddy

Recommended Posts

It's unfortunate but ESPN doesn't care about the Panthers upset, or the Cardinals collapse. There are not two big market northeastern teams involved, so...

because they see it as a fluke. they see it as one game. the cards will still challenge for the division and a playoff spot while the panthers will still finish 3rd and out of the playoffs.

any team is capable of beating any other team on any given week. this is how they view it and its not the top story of the week which was clearly the vikings green bay game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While we do get very little coverage when we do well, to be honest at this point do we deserve it? The team is pretty inconsistent and there is not a lot to say, pretty much just " if they run the ball and dont put the game in Jakes hand this is the team they can be." and maybe a quick nod to our defense, which will only be a quick spot on Peppers and no mention of anything else ( Martin,Beason,Davis,Johnson ).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ESPN has "never" cared about our team. It burns me up that we constantly get looked over as we don't even exist. Same with our local broadcasting stations, they won't show our games unless we are doing great. They will show Dallas or Wash when they are doing awful. I write in every chance I get to let them know I am unhappy with them, don't know if it helps but I try. Thank God for the internet so I can watch my Panthers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...