Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Breer: Panthers next coach to have "considerable say"

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Who gives a fug what his win percentage is in colleges damn dude. He plays like two or maybe three tough games every year. Never has beaten Ohio State. Hell why wouldn't he have a win percentage like that. There some facts maybe you should quit talking.

 

I fuging do and a 100,000 other Big Blue alumni and Fans.... Now what??

Come up with more dumb non fact based opinions.. You're great with that..

 

Barry_Switzer.jpg.716922cd5cb275565ce84ddce2d26f2b.jpg

Here another super coach with a championship buddy have at it..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

Who gives a fug what his win percentage is in colleges damn dude. He plays like two or maybe three tough games every year. Never has beaten Ohio State. Hell why wouldn't he have a win percentage like that. There some facts maybe you should quit talking.

 

Lol. If college win percentages don't matter, then why would beating Ohio St.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
steven8989 Newbie

steven8989

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Lol. If college win percentages don't matter, then why would beating Ohio St.?

 

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

His head might explode if you ask him to explain his logic..

38031394_giphy(2).gif.677d515070347c63baf0f76074e4f25c.gif

Hey y'all the ones that keep harping about wanting a winning team but want these mediocre coaches that win meaningless games except the ones that matter. Y'all where made for each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

 

Hey y'all the ones that keep harping about wanting a winning team but want these mediocre coaches that win meaningless games except the ones that matter. Y'all where made for each other.

920x920.thumb.jpg.3dd32377968a121aad4427bf69d5732c.jpg

Only 79.. Looking for a job fellas..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, steven8989 said:

 

Hey y'all the ones that keep harping about wanting a winning team but want these mediocre coaches that win meaningless games except the ones that matter. Y'all where made for each other.

I mean, I am not the one calling a head coach with a 69.5% NFL career winning percentage "mediocre." 

Harbaugh may be difficult to deal with at a personal level but he is anything but a mediocre coach. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I am not the one calling a head coach with a 69.5% NFL career winning percentage "mediocre." 

Harbaugh may be difficult to deal with at a personal level but he is anything but a mediocre coach. 

This is who steve wants..

122319_Tom-Coughlin.jpg.cc61d8c8cceb32ed1e743ebc4acd52c7.jpg

He just got fired has a 2 rings.. Looking for new players he can fined to revolt...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I am not the one calling a head coach with a 69.5% NFL career winning percentage "mediocre." 

Harbaugh may be difficult to deal with at a personal level but he is anything but a mediocre coach. 

The question with Harbaugh has always been how long you can sustain it.

You can get away with the whole always angry, constantly screaming, nothing is ever good enough persona when your audience is a bunch of college kids who'll be recycled in 3 or 4 years anyway. With adult professionals who are making more money than you are, it's not so easy.

Heck, there were signs that Harbaugh had already worn out his welcome in San Francisco even before he and the team wound up parting ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The question with Harbaugh has always been how long you can sustain it.

You can get away with the whole always angry, constantly screaming, nothing is ever good enough persona when your audience is a bunch of college kids who'll be recycled in 3 or 4 years anyway. With adult professionals who are making more money than you are, it's not so easy.

Heck, there were signs that Harbaugh had already worn out his welcome in San Francisco even before he and the team wound up parting ways.

Yeah, that is the big concern for sure. Still, I'd take him for a 3-4 year stretch if he netted us a Super Bowl. I'll take that trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, that is the big concern for sure. Still, I'd take him for a 3-4 year stretch if he netted us a Super Bowl. I'll take that trade.

I'd take John. Not so sure about Jim.

Mind you, John isn't likely going anywhere anytime soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • SmokinwithWilly
      Rookies

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      The only thing I said was he was part of the staff that made part of the decisions, and that I am judging the decisions made by that group as a whole. As assistant GM, you can pretty much guarantee his input held more sway than an intern or the guy that takes coffee requests. Fitterer didn't operate in a vacuum. Neither does Morgan now. While Fitterer did have the ultimate decision, to say that Dan had no input in ranking boards, evaluating FAs, trade offers or anything else would be asinine. We all know he did. Otherwise what the hell was his job as assistant GM? He wouldn't have been kept for 3 years if he was arguing every decision Scott ever made.    And the actual quote was "Morgan has done a bang up job in the draft and FA. Compared to what the last guy did, he is kicking ass and taking names." So is XL kicking ass and Brooks taking names from last years draft or did I get it backwards? We took Wallace over Payton Wilson because he was an injury risk after trading up for a RB with a torn ACL? Which one of the kicking ass and taking names was that?  Maybe we should review the thousands of gameday posts calling for XL to get off the field because he's a bust and can't catch a cold. We could review the posts about Brooks but... And Wilson. He's at 118 tackles this season vs 36 for Wallace.  I gave credit to Dan for a good draft this year. But I'm also not ignoring last year's draft either since he did that one after the last guy too.  That's not a strawman. 
    • shaqattaq
      WE WIN FUG BAKER MAYFIELD THREAD!

      By shaqattaq · Posted

      And then, in week 18, we can take Mayfield out of the game and whoop Bridgewater's @$$ for good measure! Let the former QB revenge train roll on!!
    • MHS831
      I’m starting to believe Nijman….

      By MHS831 · Posted

      If we keep our guards in tact ($$$) and go with Mays at C, some OT depth would be nice. I think we should be happy about CB with Thornton's development (pre injury) and Smith Wade. I think Ransom is developing nicely, but I would like to see a FS type for situations. We suck at ILB and Edge (as a whole). We should be OK at RB.  I hope we sign Dowdle to a short contract. QB?  There are signs of hope and development.  (I don't like our backup QB) TE?  Good draft for TE, but I think we are developing with Evans, Sanders, and Tremble. WR?  A #2 with Coker and Horn in the slot.  XL?  What is that? We should be good in 2026. Morgan does more than draft.  Free agency has been strong too.  (Just emptying my brain on your comment--sorry)
×
×
  • Create New...