Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PSL Owners Losing Seats for Luxury Suites


GRWatcher

Recommended Posts

I just checked PSL source and other websites for comparable seats. They're are multiple seats with very similar values to what the Panthers are offering in cash. These seats aren't worth 7,000. People quit buying PSLs the second Tepper mentioned new stadium. This will be a mess for a bit, but there is no legal ground in court where someone can convince a judge those psls are worth more then 2,000-3,000. The Contract even says this is not an investment, don't treat it like one. Make settlement offers and argue with them, they would rather settle then go to court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first 8 rows of the endzone are the worst seats in the house. You can't even barely see half the field and end up watching the game on TV. Cam Newton never gave grown men footballs, so only the kids in row 1 miss out, heck he might not even be her next year. It does kind of suck for one reason, this dang stadium was designed were 70% of the seats were in the upper deck (whose bright idea was that) that takes about 1,000 affordable lower deck seats away. I still think Panthers will end up going up on their offer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

We should start a thread for nothing but cute puppy pictures just for the sake of seeing how someone will find a way to politicize it three posts in.

Or we could just ban people that offend people's sensitivities, and wipe their whole posting history.
 

But, I'm not telling you anything new.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

The first 8 rows of the endzone are the worst seats in the house. You can't even barely see half the field and end up watching the game on TV. Cam Newton never gave grown men footballs, so only the kids in row 1 miss out, heck he might not even be her next year. It does kind of suck for one reason, this dang stadium was designed were 70% of the seats were in the upper deck (whose bright idea was that) that takes about 1,000 affordable lower deck seats away. I still think Panthers will end up going up on their offer.

Go to your kitchen and grab a bowl. Now explain to me how you'd ever fit as many seats in the lower portion of the bowl as the upper portion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Panther said:

False...

True. If you can see a fade completion in the endzone on the other side of the stadium from the first 3 rows of the endzone, you have some amazing eyes. I would take upper sideline over lower endzone 10/10 times. The Panthers are offering a return on investment after 26 years of use or a even better set of psls. There is no case here. It is in the agreement they can raise ticket prices, a judge doesn't care that you liked Sunday giveaways. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Go to your kitchen and grab a bowl. Now explain to me how you'd ever fit as many seats in the lower portion of the bowl as the upper portion.


Don't expect to have more in the lower, but there is like 20,000 to 50,000 if I remember correctly. Usually the average is 30,000 to 40,000 or something. Plus, probably now around 35% of the lower bowl is now club seating... I don't know another NFL stadium like that... Half the sideline, a large majority of the corners and endzone are now club seating. Go to another NFL stadium and see if it looks like ours, there is like 10,000 non-club seats in the lowers now... 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pantherzack179812 said:

True. If you can see a fade completion in the endzone on the other side of the stadium from the first 3 rows of the endzone, you have some amazing eyes. I would take upper sideline over lower endzone 10/10 times. The Panthers are offering a return on investment after 26 years of use or a even better set of psls. There is no case here. It is in the agreement they can raise ticket prices, a judge doesn't care that you liked Sunday giveaways. 

Yes the other endzone is hard to see. That isn't half the field.

No idea what your last two sentences mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Happy Panther said:

Yes the other endzone is hard to see. That isn't half the field.

No idea what your last two sentences mean.

There is no case in this, people are complaining their PSLs are worth more then what the Panthers are offering, when I found comparable prices give or take 500 a piece on the PSLs. The Panthers are offering to UPGRADE their PSLs for free. It doesn't stand in court you liked Cam Newton giving you footballs, the team will face nothing for this. I would gladly take lowers on the 30 in exchange for endzone seats.  So not being able to see some of the most important parts of the game is not important? I can't see anything decently past the 40 from there tbh, it's too much of a straight shot. rows 6-8 I could halfway see something. I don't mind 200 level and 100 endzone in the upper rows. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That is a big HELL NO. As bad as XL was this season, at least he adds a dimension that the coaches can use for specific plays. Coleman is just as bad, yet adds zero diversity to our receiving corps. I’ll take the guy that at least cares enough to show up to meetings. Getting traded to a new team won’t change either of their work ethics.
    • I don't think there is any real reason to amend the rule. If you do, the teams will just find a way to abuse it. All the Browns have to do is just interview SOMEONE to "get through" the process. Hell, interview Jim Caldwell if that's what the actual goal is, just to get around it.  Also, they have all of the candidates required for the Rooney Rule in Aden Durde and Nate Scheelhaase. They are in full compliance already. Scheelhaase is already scheduled for a second interview, for that matter.
    • I don't know about the stans but he's at times been like 60 percent of the offense on a playoff calibre team. He put up 1202 rushing yards and 10 touchdowns, then had effing 102 receptions for 924 yards and seven receiving touchdowns. He touched the ball 413 times this season (an average of 24 times per game.) Then you have to add in that he's a hell of a blocker when called upon. Without him, the injury depleted 49ers in a hot NFCWest division don't make the playoffs at all.  If that isn't the Most Valuable Player on the team then who should be? The idea that it is an award solely for QBs is just narrow. Edit to add: Will he win it? No. 
×
×
  • Create New...