Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sign OT Jack Conklin

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

By (ATL'ien)CamNewton,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
Posted

For some reason the Titans did not pick up the 5th year option on the former #8 OVR draft pick ...

First Team All-Pro as a rookie in '16

57 Games Started in 4 seasons including all 16 this season

Will be 26 in August. This man is about as sure a thing at Tackle as you're going to get and I would have no problem if Hurney and Tepper had the Brinks Truck back-up into Conklin's driveway.

Signing Conklin  stabilizes one of the Tackle positions for five years. Set it and forget it. He's been mostly a RT - who knows if we would try him out at LT .. he played LT in college ..

What a big boost this guy would give our offensive line. We're so down and depressed about the state of our offensive line but we sign this guy and wow it looks a whole lot better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Jared Patterson said:

He has had one decent year which was this year, been terrible other than that, that is why they didnt pick up his option. Also we already have a RT in Moton. Conklin can't come close to playing Left

He was a First-Team All-Pro his rookie season ..

He only played 9 games last season which was when they had to make the decision on his option - they decided not to pick it up and Conklin played well this season in all 16 games ...

Guy is as sure a thing as you can get. fug drafting a OT at #7  .. this guy was taken #8 in 2016 and has lived up to where he was drafted.

Has been a very reliable pro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, Jesse said:

As much as I want and we need a OT, please no more Matt Kalil types. I'd rather have a Bryan Bulaga or Anthony Constanzo if we decide to move on an OT in free agency.

lol .. this Conklin is not a Matt Kalil type.

Everybody here should be in complete agreement that we sign Conklin.

Guy is a premier Tackle in this league.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

For some reason the Titans did not pick up the 5th year option on the former #8 OVR draft pick ...

First Team All-Pro as a rookie in '16

57 Games Started in 4 seasons including all 16 this season

Will be 26 in August. This man is about as sure a thing at Tackle as you're going to get and I would have no problem if Hurney and Tepper had the Brinks Truck back-up into Conklin's driveway.

Signing Conklin  stabilizes one of the Tackle positions for five years. Set it and forget it. He's been mostly a RT - who knows if we would try him out at LT .. he played LT in college ..

What a big boost this guy would give our offensive line. We're so down and depressed about the state of our offensive line but we sign this guy and wow it looks a whole lot better.

I dont think you get the gist of what tepper wants and what Rhule is going to build.  This is going to be a rebuild from the ground up.  A total culture change.  They are going to handpick, mostly through the draft players that they want and how it fits in their vision.  They are not in a "win now" mentality.  He has already said as much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

I dont think you get the gist of what tepper wants and what Rhule is going to build.  This is going to be a rebuild from the ground up.  A total culture change.  They are going to handpick, mostly through the draft players that they want and how it fits in their vision.  They are not in a "win now" mentality.  He has already said as much.

No, man. We signed Joe Brady to win now. You're caught up in the smokescreen. We are winning, and now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

No, man. We signed Joe Brady to win now. You're caught up in the smokescreen. We are winning, and now.

You might want to tell Tepper that because he said the exact opposite.  And I dont think hiring a 30 year old offensive coordinator signals we are in a "win now" mode.

Its almost if you have never listened to Tepper talk.  He is in no way in a desperation win now mode.  In fact its the exact opposite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
(ATL'ien)CamNewton Newbie

(ATL'ien)CamNewton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

You might want to tell Tepper that because he said the exact opposite.  And I dont think hiring a 30 year old offensive coordinator signals we are in a "win now" mode.

Its almost if you have never listened to Tepper talk.  He is in no way in a desperation win now mode.  In fact its the exact opposite.

Rhule says the plan is to win a Super Bowl with Cam Newton .. but because its something you don't want to hear he was probably only just saying that. He didn't really mean it.

Tepper said ideally the Panthers win a Super Bowl with Cam Newton .. but because its something you don't want to hear he was probably only just saying that. He didn't really mean it.

But, Tepper says its going to be a five-year re-build and you just eat that right up like it's straight from the mouth of Jesus don't you. There is no, he's probably just saying that, he didn't really mean it, on that re-build statement.

Get off this board non-fan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mrcompletely11 Grand Master

mrcompletely11

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, (ATL'ien)CamNewton said:

Rhule says the plan is to win a Super Bowl with Cam Newton .. but because its something you don't want to hear he was probably only just saying that. He didn't really mean it.

Tepper said ideally the Panthers win a Super Bowl with Cam Newton .. but because its something you don't want to hear he was probably only just saying that. He didn't really mean it.

But, Tepper says its going to be a five-year re-build and you just eat that right up like it's straight from the mouth of Jesus don't you. There is no, he's probably just saying that, he didn't really mean it, on that re-build statement.

Get off this board non-fan.

A) There is no need for insults

B)Tepper has made more comments then just that one about it being a culture change, process, program etc

C) What else would you expect them to say about Cam?  Plus every time they mention him its with the caveat "if he is healthy...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Joe Bear
      Okay, now face the facta guyd

      By Joe Bear · Posted

      No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • ForJimmy
      JJ Jansen on tanking

      By ForJimmy · Posted

      We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • HaricotVert
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By HaricotVert · Posted

      I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...